GOAN NAMES – VALMIKI
By Valmiki Faleiro

Goa, as we saw last Sunday, has only six ‘Valmikis’ … per the local phone 
directory,
that is. Five of them are Catholics. Of these, one is the well-known diocesan 
priest,
Fr. Valmiki Dias Gonsalves, the other is the irreverent chap you’re presently 
reading.
Yet, the two – friends personally – are often mixed.

Around 1977. Pop star Remo performs in Margao. Fr. Valmiki has painstakingly
organized the show. In his acknowledgements, Remo thunders, “… and, in a very
special way, I thank Rev. Fr. Valmiki Faleiro.”

I had just subscribed to Goanet. Responding to one of my first posts on the 
forum, an
old chum of Fr. Valmiki responds, from the Americas, “Hi reverend”!

This time, it was Fr. Valmiki all right, talking to a mutual friend from 
Chinchinim, now in
the US, at a wedding reception at Benaulim’s Taj Exotica. Her hubby, a medical
specialist I never met, greets, “Glad to meet you, Valmiki Faleiro!”

Talking of the Taj, a former Taj-Aguada boss, over the public address at the 
Loutulim
church, thanks “Fr. Valmiki Faleiro” … even as the Rev. Valmiki Gonsalves is at 
the
altar.

Tongue slips on just six Valmikis in Goa! Why, when Fr. Valmiki served at the 
next-
door Holy Spirit church, even the postman mixed identities, and our letters. Of 
the six
Valmikis, only one is Hindu. (An internet search yields Valmikis with surnames 
like
Bankay, Biswas, Mukherjee, Raghunathan, Ramsewak, Rao, Raj, Rengadhar...)
Which brings up the question: why don’t Goan Hindus name their sons after the 
great
Indian sage?

For a plausible answer, let us pan back in time … to about the year 1000 BC. 
Story
goes that a Brahmin, Prachetas, begot his tenth child, a son. For reasons 
unknown, he
entrusted the child for upbringing to a man who lived in the forests – and 
waylaid and
killed travelers for a livelihood. The man raised the child in his 
‘profession’. The boy
became the merciless bandit ‘Valya Koli’.

One day, as Valya was about to strike his next victim, the aged wayfarer turned 
and
asked Valya, “Why do you do this?”

Valya replied, “To provide for my family.”

The old man asked Valya that while his family shared his earnings, would they 
share
his guilt of sin? Would they partake of the punishment? The traveler told Valya 
to ask
his family, promising to wait at that spot until Valya returned. He was 
Naradamuni.

Back at his forest hideout, Valya’s wife and children shot back, “why should we 
share
the guilt of your sins? It’s your duty to provide for us, how you do it is your 
concern.”
Valya, as if thunderstruck, returned to Narada.

Valya was contrite. Narada told him, “All your life you’ve known only killing 
(“mar”).
Your lips are not pure to utter god’s name. Sit here and utter just that word, 
‘Mar, mar,
mar…’ in atonement, until I return.”

Valya sat under a tree and began reciting “Mar, mar…” Hours turned to days, 
months,
and years. Gradually, the chant of “Mar, mar…” reversed in alphabetical order 
and
turned to “Ram, Ram…,” god’s name! Eleven years had passed. An anthill 
(“valmik”)
had grown over him. Narada finally returned, to find “Valmiki Prabhavo Vasya” 
(one
who emerged from an anthill.)

Killer Valya, now Valmiki, led an ascetic’s life. One day that too changed.

Returning from bath in the river, he noticed, on a nearby tree, two birds 
making love.
Just then, a hunter’s arrow hit the male bird, throwing it to the ground. The 
female
cried bitterly by the side of her dead mate. An anguished Valmiki uttered a 
curse, the
‘Ma Nishad.’ Its verse was so creative that Brahma, the Creator, ordained 
Valmiki to
compose an epic. The “world’s greatest story” – as veteran theatre director, 
Aamir
Raza Husain, producer of ‘The Legend of Ram’, described the timeless ‘Ramayana.’
24,000 lucid verses, four times the length of the Iliad.

No controversy brewed by politicians, like over the ‘Ram Setu’ navigation 
channel or
over Prof. AK Ramanujan’s essay, “300 Ramayanas,” can steal from the Ramayana.
Its richness lies in its hundreds of versions and interpretations – even by 
Buddhists
and Jains. Why, Valmiki himself is seen in ancient scriptures from three 
different
facets: in the ‘Mahabharat’ he is Rishi, in ‘Taittiriya Pratishakya’ he is the 
philologist,
while ‘Kalidasa’ and ‘Bhavbhuti’ refer to him as the poet/writer.

Why, then, don’t Goan Hindus name their sons after this sage? The obvious 
answer:
what if he turns out to be ‘Valya’ and not Valmiki?

PS. From an e-mail: “An Olympic shooter wins gold, Govt. gives him Rs. three 
crore.
A commando shooter dies, fighting terrorists, Govt. gives his family Rs. five 
lakhs.”
(ENDS.)

The Valmiki Faleiro weekly column at:

http://www.goanet.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=330

==============================================================================
The above article appeared in the December 14, 2008 edition of the Herald, Goa

Reply via email to