I beg to disagree with the good Father. Indisputably, the Church has been run in the past by the intellectuals, who turned God's word into undecipherable "theology" and doctrine, which they used to shut out the laity from true participation in the Church. Hence the recent swing towards revivalism, is a natural thirst of the people for the living word of God rather than being subject to" intellectual" dissertations and treatises like we have been in the past. In fact, even the present Pope has successfully obliterated the easy to understand and use language of the Mass and taken it back to the ponderous and obsolete structure of the distant past.

What the Church needs perhaps, is to inculcate integrity in its workings and fundamentals. Whether it is a "inculturated" or "European colonial" or "revivalist" or "renewed" Church, there is not much difference and it really does not matter if it does not have integrity and humility. For example, the Church in Goa, is still silent on its various misdemeanours like selling of land etc. How can the Church have any moral authority if it does not openly and humbly apologise for the past and admit its human failings. Merely expecting the world from the laity and imposing burdens on them, does not help, even if the Church's top leadership has "changed its direction", but only intellectually, and not emotionally from the heart.

Diana Pinto


Fr Desmond de Sousa CSsR wrote

Since the renewal process of the Church initiated by the
Second Vatican Council (1962-65), many serious efforts to
break with the colonial past have been attempted. But studies
show that the greatest blocks to genuine renewal are the
traditionalism of the clergy and the lethargy of the laity.
Both these blocks are consequences of their colonial past.

         The clergy generally find it extremely difficult to
         accept a more participative, co-responsible and
         socially committed Church with the laity.  This is
         understandable, since the "older" model of the
         Church and the content of faith has produced a
         Blessed Joseph Vaz (1651-1711), a Venerable Fr
         Agnelo D'Souza (1869-1927), both totally indigenous
         priests and many eminent clergymen.  Both by
         tradition and training, they are deeply attached to
         the pyramidal model of the Church, with its
         rituals, traditions, devotions and practices, which
         is the only one they know.

The laity however, are deeply divided about the pace and
direction of change that renewal demands. A paradigm shift in
faith formation is needed. They need a more inductive
reflection on the daily realities of life to discover the
challenge of God acting within these realities, rather than
the traditional deductive process of learning abstract truths
of faith by heart.


Reply via email to