S.C.infalible? The decision of SC judgments are binding on all courts This will avoid conflicts of deviation and uphold the order of law uniformly The benches of S.C with no of judges on the bench is to ensure against bias and reasoned order and erase human errors. This is exactly the provision of review is factored When four judges of SC in press conference openly expressed anguish . did they commit contempt . This is unprecedented in the annals of S.C .Does it scandalize the sanctity of trust, process and performance of the court.Why did that matter was treated by kid gloves by judicial system? Tthere was not even iota of dissent on that issue by the learned council Well it was covered, protected by freedom of speech and expression under the constitution, as the companion judges enjoy privilege and immunity That protest and revolt was given a quiet burial
When lady officer of the court complained about sexual harassment by CJI. It was thrown out as without merit and substance and CJI is exonerated. The CJI sat on judgement in his own case himself against himself and legally it was right but would be contempt if questioned on the propriety of such decision. He did not recluse himself. can bias per se be ruled out even remotely .Fortunately she has been reinstated, which implies her basic accusations of serious nature against CJI were malafide, aimed at defaming and lowering the reputation There was no admonishment or strictures passed against her for maligning , defaming the highest authority of CJI with salacious, malicious intent SOME one needs to enlighten whether the court can make i, grant relief by it's own prayer when it is not the pleaded at anytime during dependency of the case Ot is the recent judgment on religious dispute Is what is below the ground the basis of judgement than what is above it fior 3 centuries and more Is there any content material to indicate historically that structure was demolished to build another What is the position in law of right of adverse possession and period of limitation Normally right to adverse possession is 12 years unhindered,unencumbered possession for the above period with madrassa court extending it to 3o years as settled law I am told THE law on contempt is archaic British insertion in the statutes to stress their superiority complex, protect themselves and to legally shut dissent It must be reviewed and abolished Everyone in public service must be ready and willing to accept and adjust to criticism fairly and not mow down dissent with iron hand to serve as deterrent To err is human and judges as human are no exception IS it right for any judicial officer, however old the matter be pending to set a deadline for finalisation , deadline before hos own retirement Is there a precedent of this nature? Can any judicial officer accept perks accommodation driver apart from his retirement benefit immediately after retirement is there any such precedent of a windfall or largesse.whichcanbe inferred as return favour of previous position It may be perfectly legal but morally and ethically undesirable Further accepting Govt nomination to further benefit from such posting is again emphasizing admiration and recognition of beneficial outcomes IF ANY RIGHT THINKING FREE INDIAN IN A SECULAR DEMICRATIC BE SADDLED WITH CONTEMPT NELSOB LOPES Chinchinim Of this nature