>"The Indian novelist Arundhati Roy could face serious charges over comments she made 14 years ago about Kashmir after an official from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Friday authorized her prosecution under a stringent anti-terrorism law."
>"On Friday, Saxena [the BJP lieutenant governor of New Delhi] allowed the case to be escalated by announcing that Roy could be prosecuted under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, a provision that allows terrorism suspects to be held preemptively without bail for many years before charges are brought. Crucially, the UAPA has no statute of limitations, allowing authorities to levy charges against Roy even though her alleged offenses took place in 2010." >"Another speaker at the 2010 conference, Kashmiri law professor Sheikh Showkat Hussain will also face investigation under the UAPA, Saxena’s office announced." >“'If by prosecuting Arundhati Roy under UAPA BJP trying to prove they’re back, well they’re not,' Mahua Moitra, member of Parliament from the Trinamool Congress, said on X. 'This kind of fascism is exactly what Indians have voted against.'” ---------------------------------- By: Gerry Shih Published in: *The Washington Post* Date: June 15, 2024 Roy could face grave charges over comments she made 14 years ago about Kashmir under a stringent antiterrorism law. NEW DELHI — The Indian novelist Arundhati Roy could face serious charges over comments she made 14 years ago about Kashmir after an official from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Friday authorized her prosecution under a stringent anti-terrorism law. The decision to invoke India’s controversial terrorism provision against one of the ruling party’s most outspoken — and internationally renowned — critics comes just days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi was sworn in for a third term, and it has been widely viewed as a signal of strength emanating from Modi’s camp. Although Modi was forced this week to form a new coalition government after a shock election result on June 4 reduced his seat count in Parliament, the Indian leader has projected an image of confidence as he kept his cabinet unchanged in key positions and vowed to double down in his fight against his political opponents, whom he called corrupt. The office of V.K. Saxena, the BJP lieutenant governor of New Delhi who sanctioned Roy’s anti-terrorism case, said investigative agencies had sought the use of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in Roy’s case and Saxena approved the request. It did not offer further comment. But several BJP spokespeople defended the move and portrayed Roy as a traitor backed by the opposition Congress party. On a prime-time debate show, BJP national spokesman Tuhin Sinha accused Roy of seeking to demoralize the Indian Army. Another BJP spokesman, Shehzad Poonawalla, compared the writer to convicted terrorists, in a video statement published on X. “Arundhati Roy said that Kashmir is not an integral part of India when the Congress was in power,” Poonawalla said in his post Saturday. “Congress and its ecosystem support people who want to break India into many pieces.” Roy, 62, first faced a criminal complaint after she told an audience at a conference in New Delhi that Kashmir was never part of India before it came under occupation by Indian troops. Roy’s comments sparked immediate protests by BJP supporters, but the criminal case faded away. It was resurrected 13 years later, in October, when Saxena sanctioned her prosecution on charges of promoting enmity between groups and threatening India’s national integrity. On Friday, Saxena allowed the case to be escalated by announcing that Roy could be prosecuted under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, a provision that allows terrorism suspects to be held preemptively without bail for many years before charges are brought. Crucially, the UAPA has no statute of limitations, allowing authorities to levy charges against Roy even though her alleged offenses took place in 2010. One of the most controversial parts of the Indian legal code, the UAPA has been invoked by the Modi government in recent years against student activists in New Delhi, journalists in Kashmir and the Jesuit priest Stan Swamy, who died in prison in 2021 while facing terrorism charges. Mary Lawlor, the United Nations human rights special rapporteur, has criticized Indian authorities of using the law to “criminalize human rights defenders.” Another speaker at the 2010 conference, Kashmiri law professor Sheikh Showkat Hussain will also face investigation under the UAPA, Saxena’s office announced. Roy’s lawyer, Rebecca John, called the case politically motivated. “If the Delhi police took 14 years to investigate a case, where the only charge against Ms. Roy is one of making a ‘speech,’ which admittedly did not lead to any violence or other ‘unlawful activity,’ I am afraid it speaks poorly of the investigating skills of the police force,” John said in a text message. “Clearly, the case against Ms. Roy is political in nature given her unfailing commitment to human rights.” After shooting to international prominence with her debut novel, “The God of Small Things,” in 1997, Roy has campaigned against a broad range of issues, including the Indian administration of Kashmir, the building of dams and U.S. foreign policy. Since Modi’s rise to national power in 2014, Roy has become one of his most visible critics in international forums by frequently writing essays in Western publications and delivering public speeches. On Saturday, politicians from several opposition parties accused the BJP of authoritarian behavior. “If by prosecuting Arundhati Roy under UAPA BJP trying to prove they’re back, well they’re not,” Mahua Moitra, member of Parliament from the Trinamool Congress, said on X. “This kind of fascism is exactly what Indians have voted against.” Roy declined to comment. *Anant Gupta in New Delhi contributed to this report.* *Gerry Shih is the India Bureau Chief for the Washington Post, covering India and neighboring countries.*
