Goa has been commemorating June 18 as the Revolution Day since its Liberation.
The day was the turning point in Goa's freedom struggle. Whenever I pass the
now-named Lohia Maidan in Margao, I stand and imagine what may have been the
scene that fateful day when Ram Manohar Lohia was arrested alon
Eugene Correia wrote to Paulo:
1: What I said about Telo may have never come back on Indian soil,
was a deliberate attempt to annoy you and JC. But if that line made
you go LOL it served its purpose.
2: The good doctor said that Lohia did not speak at Margoa. Lohia
began his speech and after d
---
http://www.GOANET.org
---
South Asian Film Festival in Goa from Fri (June 27) to Mon (June 30)
Once again I write from memory and tidbits from some notes, so corrections are
welcome. I would like to add to the debate but not necessarily take up Dr.
Colaco's points. However, I must concede that some fnoted reedom fighters
suddenly saw that things were not rosy for them and hence they ran a
Well, yes Telo was charged with bigamy. For that he got what 10 to 12 years in
jail? Historical data has shown how the Portuguese worked against the
nationalists.
I am not sure but I think Telo, on his return, was bypassed for the
supervisor's post in All-India Radio, Delhi and the post given it
FF
pension of the day ...and their wages are deducted for non-working
days!
"Oh! Brother, do you remember: 18th June?"
Mog asundi.
Miguel
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eugene Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Goanet] June 18 -- Let the Revolution Begi
I sent a post in reply to Miguel's post before reading Fred's post. So, the
Telo's bio makes it clear that he had "divorced" his first wife and later
married Elsa. So, waa the bigamy charge technically right or was it proved in
Portuguese court that the divorce never legally took place? In my po
Dear Minguel,
Sad to know that the point I made escaped your attention. I said that some
noted freedom fighters left India. It was as a sidelight that I mentioned Telo
wanted to leave India and how his so-called friend betrayed him. I would like
to know further if Telo was, in fact, married to
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:goanet-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eugene Correia
> Sent: 20 June 2008 07:20
> To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
> Subject: Re: [Goanet] June 18 -- Let the Revolution Begin
>
> Dear Minguel,
>
> Sad to know that the point I made
like Dilkush Desai or Ramakant Khalap. He is already
suffering hallucinations and calling a former teacher, with an M.Phil
in Latin American studies from Goa University, a Naxalite.
Mog asundi
Miguel
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:33:02 +0100
From: "Paulo Colaco Dias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Miguel, again you have missed the point. It was not me but JC who raised the
issue obliquely and then I said that I know that Telo was charged with bigamy.
The book perhaps tells how long Telo was sentenced. If not for Indian
government's intervention, he would not have been back on Indian soil.
Eugene Correia:
1: Telo was NOT happy that the Indian government that instead of him
being made the "supervisor" of the Portuguese section of AIR, Nehru
prevered Laxmanrao Sardesai.
2: JC likes to "tease". He should give us the gist of the conversation
with Telo. But then to ask in the same manne
o
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eugene Correia
Sent: 21 June 2008 11:54
To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
Subject: Re: [Goanet] June 18- Let the Revolution Begin
Miguel, again you have missed the point. It was not me but JC who raised the
issue ob
Paulo Colaco Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[1] I find laughable Eugene's claim
[2] And can Eugene be sure of this?
[3] Eugene's claim is ridiculous.
[4] Where are the facts in Eugene's claim?
=
jc's response:
Paulo my friend,
You are being absolutely unfair. You really expect Eugene to b
Paulo, did you hear of the term "hyperbole." What I said about Telo may have
never come back on Indian soil, was a deliberate attempt to annoy you and JC.
But if that line made you go LOL it served its purpose.
The good doctor said that Lohia did not speak at Margoa. Lohia began his speech
and a
putation.
Best
Paulo.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eugene Correia
Sent: 24 June 2008 11:59
To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
Subject: Re: [Goanet] June 18-- Let the Revolution Begin
Paulo, did you hear of the term "hyperbole." What I
Paulo Colaco Dias.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilbert Lawrence
Sent: 27 June 2008 01:04
To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
Subject: [Goanet] June 18-- Let the Revolution Begin
Related threads and discussions on Telo were "Hyperbole -
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:32:16 +0100
From: "Paulo Colaco Dias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
It is a fact that Goa was colonised by Portugal. It is
also a fact that the Supreme Court of India determined
that the Indian Union acquired the
Portuguese State of India on the 19th Dec. 1961 by an
act of conques
June 2008 16:03
To: goanet@lists.goanet.org
Subject: Re: [Goanet] June 18-- Let the Revolution Begin
>Hey, Paulo. My family was on the opposite side of
>this battle from yours. We won. We feel liberated
>because we did not want to be ruled by white
>Europeans. You lost. Get ove
xists
for their claim for reparations or restitution.
Q.E.D.
Brilliant, Mario, absolutely brilliant!
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Mario Goveia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Goanet] June 18-- Let the Revolution Begin
Paulo wrote:
1: Mario, you and others fail to understand what the real Goan issue
is all about.
2: Goa should not be ruled by anyone...The Pakistanis were also
ethnical Indian but they chose not to be ruled by India.
3: Goa never belonged to the Republic of India ..The Republic of India
* did not
To whom it may concern:
1. Hundreds of collaborative peace movements across
the globe between Palestinians and Israelis see the
issue in a humanistic way. Suggest one minimally looks
at:
www.mideastpeaceforum
to start with. Google can be quite useful in this
respect.
2. I disagree with Paulo abou
CORNEL DACOSTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1: I disagree with Paulo about his interpretation that India had no
right to Goa. Paulo's position, and some others is that, India was not
a political entity when the Portuguese conquered Goa. This point is
perhaps true although India was a geographical entity.
> Mario wrote:
>>
> Hey, Paulo. My family was on the opposite side of
> this battle from yours. We won. We feel liberated
> because we did not want to be ruled by white
> Europeans. You lost. Get over it.
>>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:17:38 -0400
From: Chris Vaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
By this re
Paulo wrote:
>
1: Mario, you and others fail to understand what the
real Goan issue is all about.
>
Mario responds:
>
Hey, Paulo. I thought you said I won the bike?:-))
>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 09:10:29 -0400
From: "J. Colaco < jc>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Surely Mario and his ilk do not know that th
ing polite :--))
And I have most of the African leadership -- and my fellow dictator-in-chief
Hosni Mubarak as my supporter !
Cheers!
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Mario Goveia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [G
Eugene Correia wrote:
(1) Once again I write from memory and tidbits from some notes, so
corrections are welcome.
(2) I would like to add to the debate but not necessarily take up Dr.
Colaco's points.
(3) However, I must concede that some fnoted reedom fighters suddenly
saw that things were not
---
http://www.GOANET.org
---
South Asian Film Festival in Goa from Fri (June 27) to Mon (June 30)
28 matches
Mail list logo
