Frederick [FN] Noronha wrote:
The issue is not about it being derogatory, but more a question of
definition and exclusion. Why is a Gaudi just described as a Gaudi,
and a Bamon or Chardo usually portrayed as a Goan? Isn't this
patronising?
Wonder if it would be acceptable to describe someone as
The issue is not about it being derogatory, but more a question of
definition and exclusion. Why is a Gaudi just described as a Gaudi, and a
Bamon or Chardo usually portrayed as a Goan? Isn't this patronising?
Wonder if it would be acceptable to describe someone as a White Australian
... try it
On 23/12/2007, Venantius Pinto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fred,
I feel it is fine to title the portrait as Portrait of a Gaudi. Its
how the Rajan, as the photographer perceived the image he shot.
Needless to say, if we lean towards being PC (or protective) about his
artistic/cultural impression, we
