Protecting the interests of Goenkars

 

By Mr. Plastino D'Costa

 

When Bear Stearns, the fifth largest US investment bank was being run on by its 
creditors resulting in bringing the 85 year old company on its knees, the duo 
comprising of Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Mr. Ben Bernanke, along with 
the US Treasury Secretary, Mr. Mark Paulson came out with a package to bail out 
the bank, what is now famously known as the Paulson Plan. 

 

Overnight they trashed out a plan, by which the Federal Reserve would lend US 
tax payer money to Bear Stearns competitor, JP Morgan Chase and allow it to buy 
Bear Stearns, for a fraction of the value. Last checked the same duo was busy 
convincing US lawmakers to pour some more US taxpayer money to bail out Fannie 
May and Freddie Mac the beleaguered U.S. mortgage-finance companies. 

 

With so much financial socialism being done by the US this time, one may argue 
that the American style capitalism has got it confused this time. However, the 
trend is clear, the US Government is setting a precedent that it will bail out 
every institution affected in the US sub prime crisis in order to protect the 
economy of their country. 

 

Closer home, late last year our own duo of Indian Finance Minster along with 
the RBI Governor, in order to tame inflation, has been regularly intervening in 
the rupee exchange rate by artificially encouraging a stronger rupee by selling 
US dollars, so as to discourage exports in order to tame inflation. 

 

However, in the recent bout of inflation the same duo having realized that 
tweaking the rupee every time and ignoring fiscal deficit might not be the 
correct way to tame inflation, so the focus this time has been aggressively 
raising interest rates, increasing CRR so that they suck out money from the 
economy in the hope that they will subdue demand. 

 

Every Government wants to work for the people of the land, even if it means 
changing the rules and taking on the forces of Globalization, free markets etc. 
However, when it comes to protecting Goans, the government of Goa is always 
found wanting to make a strong case. If at all they decide something in the 
interests of the people, it is only a result of a reactive compromise solution 
only after the people have revolted. 

 

Even while making the case, Goan leaders usually get cornered by the Central 
leaders, then everybody starts referring to the rule book that says that Goa is 
a free place and nobody can be stopped from settling here. 

 

Yes it is true! Technically we cannot stop legitimate people from settling in 
Goa. Then how cum the US or for that matter our own Central Government, go 
about their regulations, if it is in the interest of their own people. The rule 
book says US Government is a capitalist country and is not supposed to spend 
tax payer money in saving private investment banks like Bear Stearns. 

 

The rule book also says subsidies should be phased out fast and market forces 
should decide prices and yet in order to be competitive the US is yet to 
eliminate farm and energy subsidies. Back home, the Indian rupee is partially 
convertible, that probably explains the RBI intervention, but the Indian 
Government is not supposed to interfere in free trade by banning exports of 
food commodities to other countries in the name of food security. However, in 
the broader interests of the people the government does just that, even if it 
means taking on the forces of powerful countries crying foul.  

 

If the Government of USA or our own Central Government takes action in the 
broader interests of its economy and its citizens, this action should itself 
tell something to the Government of Goa. The idea of protecting the local 
population in this era of globalization might sound an obsolete idea and yet 
most governments do just that. 

 

One classic example of Government which chose to ignore the local population is 
Bombay, and today we can all see why the locals of Bombay have not progressed 
among other communities in Bombay. 

 

Agreed some communities lived in Bombay even before Mahrashtra was merged with 
Bombay, but can anyone explain why the locals of Bombay inspite of living in 
the City That Never Sleeps are always caught napping and letting opportunities 
pass them by. Why do the locals of Bombay always have to fight for their place 
in the sun? Why do they hardly exist as members of the Bombay Stock Exchange, 
or for that matter the more popular Bollywood.

 

Over time their leaders have failed them. Instead of preparing them to meet 
competition from other communities head on, most of their leaders protected 
them with short term measures by reservations of jobs. Instead of focusing on 
good education, which by the way was available in plenty in Bombay, they were 
misled that job opportunity is their right and they shall have it without 
education, even if it meant burdening the company that hires them. 

 

Do we see something common between the locals of Mahrastra and the locals of 
Goa? Our problems are far worse actually, we have a population who never 
demands gainful employment from the society or the government, which makes it 
difficult for Generation Next to believe in the Goa story. We are programmed to 
go abroad, so there is no pressure by Government on corporate community to 
create meaningful jobs. 

 

There is a total mismatch between salaries in Goa, and there is a total 
disconnect between education and employment. Those who chose to stay in Goa are 
misguided by leaders to fight their own personal battles through them, and have 
lost the capacity to make their own decisions thereby depending on their 
leaders to make all the calls. 

 

We have leaders giving speeches and playing to the galleries without any 
definitive plan that will actually protect the interests of the Goans. If the 
locals have to literally fight for their survival in their own land, it means 
somewhere we have a massive structural failure which needs challenging the 
status quo.

 

In modern day no Government would like to be in a position where it has to 
resort to protection of their local population, but that's the price the 
government has to pay for keeping most of its population illiterate and 
incapable of sustaining themselves in their own land. So long as Goans don't 
get an education, don't arrest and reverse "good brain drain", don't learn to 
vote free of cost, the Government has no choice but to protect its local 
population. How to protect can always be learnt from the government of USA or 
our own Indian Government. 

 

 

Above Article appeared today 5th August 2008 on Herald Goa.

Reply via email to