https://www.livemint.com/Politics/2ovkEGOugbTwXZcemLst0L/Inside-Parrikars-Goa.html
The first time I set eyes on Manohar Parrikar, he was standing in the middle of the road and directing traffic. It was the opening night of the 2004 International Film Festival of India (IFFI), and the everyday bucolic atmosphere of Goa’s capital city of Panjim had succumbed to mass hysteria. Star-struck crowds pressed in from all directions to the Kala Academy arts complex on the Mandovi riverfront. The pavements were sardine-packed frenzy, and the roads paralyzed to standstill. Exactly then, the chief minister of India’s smallest state waded into the thick of the melee. With all attention riveted on him, he commanded the surrounding vehicles to follow his instructions. From my vantage just a few feet from his elbow, it was unforgettably fascinating to observe how he restored order by sheer force of personality, in a scant couple of minutes. Then he disappeared anew, a small smile of satisfaction clearly visible on his face This was vintage Parrikar the perfectionist, putting finishing touches on an extraordinary feat that no one – least of all his constituents – had previously imagined possible. Just months earlier, he’d improbably convinced the Information and Broadcasting Ministry to try out the country’s oldest and biggest film festival in Goa for the first time, declaring up front “we will make the event so wonderful that it will be impossible not to grant Panjim permanent venue status.” In short order, he spent over 100 crores to beautifully restore the city’s waterfront promenade, and construct a new bridge as well as the state’s first multiplex, while creating a stunning heritage precinct for the festival centered around the imposing Latinate headquarters of the former Escola Médica-Cirúrgica de Goa, the oldest medical college in Asia. Here again, circumstances bent to his bidding, and IFFI did base itself permanently in Panjim (where it returns with much fanfare each November, except now the locals are far too blasé to cause any kind of commotion about it). Looking back from what are undeniably the waning moments of Parrikar’s remarkable decades in power, it’s already clear that was the golden period. The BJP’s star performer became chief minister for the first time in 2000 with an immense burst of enthusiasm and energy that was immediately reciprocated by uncommon adulation and fierce loyalty from virtually every part of Goa’s many-layered electorate, accompanied by entirely justifiable national attention. We were all witnessing an unprecedented phenomenon: the first-ever IIT-educated chief minister, plain-speaking, disarmingly unpretentious, hard-working and exceptionally competent. His rise put an end to the see-sawing instability which had bedevilled the state previously, with incessant defections resulting in 13 separate governments over just 12 years. >From that point, politics in Goa has been all about Parrikar the colossus. He has thoroughly dominated throughout, whether as chief minister, or as the paradoxically all-powerful leader of the opposition. “What Amitabh Bachhan was to Hindi films, Manohar Parrikar was to Goan politics”, says Raju Sukerkar, a soft-spoken Panjim-based businessman and senior leader of the state RSS, who has remained staunch friends with the Goa leader for three decades. He recalls, “there was something different about him from the moment he entered the state assembly in 1994, which really showed itself when he was appointed leader of the opposition in 1999. He was the first really competent professional politician we had seen, who did his research and easily quoted facts, figures, relevant clauses. The ruling party was truly afraid of him. And the people embraced him because he really was an effective MLA. He totally changed the image of Goan politics, just like Amitabh did for Bollywood heroes.” ** Manohar Gopalkrishna Prabhu Parrikar was born on 13 December, 1955, in what was still the Estado da Índia, ruled from Lisbon by the dictator António de Oliveira Salazar. Just six years later in 1961, Indian troops swiftly decapitated feeble resistance to bring an abrupt end to more that 450 years of Portuguese colonialism. Goa was formally annexed into the Indian union, and eventually became a state on 30thMay, 1987. The Parrikar family (its name derives from the North Goa village of Parra) is staunchly Gaud Saraswat Brahmin (GSB), part of a resilient caste alliance that flourished before, after and perhaps most conspicuously during the colonial era. In her excellent 1999 book, ‘Farar Far: Local Resistance to Colonial Hegemony in Goa’, Pratima Kamat of Goa University describes “a curious paradox. The Estado da Índia, it appeared, was prompted by the crusading spirit of its ecclesiastical character, to ‘cleanse’ the local society of ‘paganism’ while availing of the services of the ‘heathens’ in deference to its commercial and financial compulsions…The mercadoof the City of Goa was controlled by Hindu shopkeepers, brokers and merchants. We have it on the testimony of European travellers that the Estado da Índiawas dependent for its very survival, for food, money, humanpower and trade, on Hindu merchants…inspite of the destruction of their temples and the ban on their ceremonies, Hindus lived and transacted business in Goa because it earned for them richer dividends than enterprise in the neighbouring territory.” After an initially zealous couple of centuries of proselytizing, the European regime in Goa lapsed to laissez-faire accommodation between religions, and syncretism flourished to an unusual degree. But all that changed after 1961, which ushered in pronounced Hindu revivalist fervour, that was accompanied by considerable backtracking and adaptation by the Goan Hindu establishment as it endeavoured to erase differences from what it perceived to be the national mainstream. This is when the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) entered the picture for the first time. Identically to its conduct during the previous nationwide freedom struggle in the first half of the 20thcentury, the right-wing paramilitary organization had stayed on the sidelines during the fight against Salazar. But then it stepped in to win the peace. Today, Parrikar is only the most prominent of any number of influential Goans of every party affiliation who developed their political consciousness from attending daily shakhas. Ask those who know him most closely, and everyone says the same thing. Parrikar is sincerely passionate about Goa, but his utmost fealty lies with the Sangh Parivar and its leaders based in Nagpur. In 2016, while serving Narendra Modi in the Cabinet as Defense Minister, he even credited the RSS for inspiring the notorious “surgical strikes” when the Indian army is said to have crossed into Pakistan to combat terrorists, “I wonder, with the combination of prime minister who comes from Mahatma Gandhi’s home state, and I, defence minister, coming from Goa which never had any martial race, and how we handled the surgical strikes. Maybe the RSS teaching was at the core.” Of all the revered ideologues and tacticians of the Hindu right, Parrikar is especially fond of quoting M. S. Golwalkar, the second RSS sarsanghchalak(supreme leader), whose 1966 book ‘Bunch of Thoughts’ was written “to clarify and understand the true purpose, the exact nature, the ambit and scope of RSS work.” In that seminal text, three major subsets of enemies are described at length: the Muslims, the Christians, and the Communists. Golwalkar writes approvingly of Hitler’s genocidal campaigns, saying “It has been the tragic lesson of history of many a country in the world that the hostile elements within the country pose a far greater menace to national security than aggressors from outside.” This sentiment is regularly echoed by Parrikar, who likes to deploy labels like “anti-national”, in one particularly absurd instance against retired military personnel whose complaints about pensions he called “an insult to the nation.” But as important as the RSS was to the young Parrikar, it was effectively invisible in Goa’s political sphere throughout the 20thcentury. Instead, the nascent polity was substantially shaped by what another fine Goa University historian has described as “the story of political will.” In his landmark 2015 book, ‘India’s First Democratic Revolution: Dayanand Bandodkar and the Rise of the Bahujan in Goa’, Parag Porobo writes, “Long before lower castes elsewhere in the nation had recognized as a group what their numerical strength could do for them in a democracy, Goa’s Bahujan Samaj – a loose conglomeration of lower castes – rallied behind Dayanand Bandodkar, a lower caste mine owner who eventually went on to become the first chief minister.” This pioneering “lower caste capitalist” demolished feudal land relations, and – in diametrical opposition to Nehruvian policies of the same time – invested heavily in human development. As a result, Goa prospered and Goans flourished. By the 1990’s, the tiny state was the richest in the country by most economic indicators. ** When Manohar Parrikar was first elected to the state assembly in 1994, he was just 39, and there were only 4 other BJP members of the assembly. But it was already apparent he was unlike anyone else. Claude Alvares, whose activist Goa Foundation has been a formidable bulwark against unsustainable development since 1986, says “Parrikar had the opportunity to strike out on his own because he did not come from the normal political ranks of either the BJP or the Congress. In fact, he was loaned to the BJP by the RSS. Few people know that this person -- whom the IIT Mumbai gave its distinguished alumnus award -- was part of the crowd that travelled to Ayodhya for the demolition of the Babri Masjid. Even if that was a well hidden event of his life, he still cultivated a simple life-style, drove his own car, dropped his own children to school, sat in road side stalls to eat with his fingers, and, my favourite, declined to wear a tie, suit and boots in his entire life. That’s my kind of man. But once he became entangled in the political tentacles of the BJP and got wrongly convinced that the BJP would carry out the RSS agenda, there was very little he could do to carry out his own programmes.” There’s no doubt the BJP in Goa is an unwieldy political animal. Of its 13 current MLAs, an astounding 7 are Catholics. For much of Parrikar’s career he has enjoyed tacit support from the Church hierarchy, which translates directly to policies widely divergent from the party’s national agenda. For example, after their own Devendra Fadnavis banned beef in neighboring Maharashtra, Goa’s BJP leadership insisted it would procure beef in other parts of India to import and distribute at affordable prices. Along with other issues, this incensed the state’s longstanding RSS head Subhash Velingkar, who complains “Parrikar has personally been indulging in a frenzied sort of Catholic-appeasement at the cost of Goa’s welfare because he is hand-in-glove with the Archbishop here. Parrikar was possessed by this desire to show himself as the one who could also manage the minorities in Goa the way Modiji has in Gujarat. But here in Goa, the opposite has happened. It is the minority community which has managed Parrikar and BJP…Even the children in Goa know Parrikar as a U-turn minister.” Velingkar’s jibes strike hard, because it is manifestly evident the original can-do visionary who seized Goa’s imagination is nowadays nowhere to be seen. Instead it has only been been glib, duplicitous, deeply disappointing and heavily compromised Parrikar. The preeminent Konkani writer, Damodar Mauzo told me “he had such a charisma of his own, such leadership qualities. I really expected him to act firmly with conviction. However, he took so many U-turns that I lost faith. He did not deliver on any of the things he promised.” Those sentiments are reflected across the Goan electorate. Even those closest to Parrikar cannot mask their painful sense of betrayal. 42-year-old Valmiki Naik grew up in Panjim, and was a vocal member of the 2011 India Against Corruption movement. He says, “Parrikar had a clean reputation at the time and did seem very genuine about fighting corruption. But soon after he got elected in 2012, he changed colours quite quickly, backpedalling from his grand promises, and enacting various amendments to the Lokayukta Act to make it weaker instead of stronger. We made many attempts to dissuade and counter him, and I remember one of the last times the IAC team went to meet him in the CM office to make a final effort, and he just wouldn’t budge. As the realisation dawned on me that Parrikar had never intended to keep his pre-election assurances, in a moment of utter frustration and disappointment, I raised my voice and promised him that the very same people who he had taken advantage of to come to power, would bring his government down one day. He is known to respond immediately and strongly to such provocative attacks, but I remember him holding back and staying completely silent, taken aback I suppose at the audacity of a whippersnapper of an activist.” Today, Naik is the AAP candidate for Panjim. Even as the giant of Goa politics exits the stage, two issues rankle most amongst friends and foes alike. The first is his longstanding craven supplication to the reviled casinos, which persist in the Mandovi river due to his personal fiat. Alvares recalls when Parrikar was in the opposition, “he threatened strong action if the casinos were not closed. However, by the time of his second inauguration as CM, Jaidev Mody, owner of most of Goa’s casinos, was sitting in the front bench of VIPs.” Arguably even more intractable is Parrikar’s abject failure to mentor the next generation of leaders for his party and state. Instead, he leaves a festering swampland of grifters and goons, each deeply suspicious of the other (for very good reasons). Raju Sukerkar says, “I’ve noticed some of these monkeys have started to wear their shirts out, and wear chappals, just like Parrikar. Some even put three pens in their shirt pockets, like him. It’s so ridiculous. You need to do a lot more than that to fill the shoes of a man like him.”