------------------------------------------------------------------------ * G * O * A * N * E * T **** C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Goa with Love - Three unique Valentine Day packages from EXPRESSIONS Say "I Love You!" in style this year For details, photos and pricing check out:
http://www.goa-world.com/expressions/valentines/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mid-air collision: India`s tangled airspace AIRPORTS AUTHORITY VS INDIAN AIR FORCE-II Ajai Shukla / New Delhi February 01, 2007 http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage.php?autono=273248&leftnm=3 &subLeft=0&chkFlg= At Hyderabad airport, you buckle into your seat for the late afternoon flight back to Delhi. The flight indicator tells you that Delhi is due north. It will be a straight flight, you believe. No time lost. You silently thank India's revolution in civil aviation. Wrong! In the cockpit, the pilot has set course south instead of north. Flying in wide circles south of Hyderabad, he climbs to 20,000 feet before seemingly heading for Goa. Ninety kilometres later he will move towards Pune, covering another 100 km before finally heading for Delhi. These inefficient diversions of civil flights at Hyderabad are caused because the airport is bordered by a vast swathe of restricted airspace belonging to the Indian Air Force (IAF) flying academies of Hakimpeth and Bidar. By the time you reach Delhi you will have flown an extra 20 minutes, and the airline will have spent Rs 40,000 extra as fuel cost. This wastage of time, fuel and money is eventually borne by the traveller. **The problem is not confined to Hyderabad. Almost half of India's airspace belongs to the military. The country is dotted with IAF fighter, helicopter and transport bases, training facilities, manufacturing units and design establishments. Each of them was allotted thousands of square kilometres of surrounding airspace at a time when civil flights were few and far between. Civil aviation officials have not been able to persuade the IAF to loosen airspace restrictions despite dramatically changed circumstances. ** Says Ajay Prasad, secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA), "The problem did not come into sharp focus as it is today. Now, with this expanding fleet, opening new routes and bringing new cities into the air map, the need for opening up the airspace has become much more important. It will cut distances short and save flying time because instead of making detours you will be able to fly in more of a straight line." The Airports Authority of India (AAI), responsible for air traffic management around civil airports and civilian air routes, has been working with the IAF route by route, in an attempt to straighten domestic and international air routes. Under pressure from the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), the IAF agreed to straighten seven international routes, but it has not allowed a single domestic flight to fly unencumbered through its vast airspace holdings. AAI Chairman K Ramalingam says, "We would like the Air Force to be more pro-active on restructuring air routes. We have urged them to release the airspace to us when they are not using it." The IAF explains that it has several reasons for such restrictions. Without separate airspace, its highly agile aircraft, with flight patterns of rapid, unexpected climbs and manoeuvres, will be a serious hazard to civil airliners in the vicinity. In several cases, the IAF has allowed civil flights to use its airspace provided they remain above 20,000 feet, the ceiling for fighter and helicopter flying. But dividing airspace by altitude doesn't solve the problem. In cases like Hyderabad, Bangalore and even Delhi, the IAF's airspace is so close to the airport that civil flights enter it before they can climb to 20,000 feet. Civil aviation authorities have come up with a proposal for "flexible use of airspace", in which the IAF would freely allow civil flights into its restricted airspace when IAF aircraft are not actually using it. Top IAF officers, however, dismiss the idea of "time-sharing". A series of expert committees on airspace issues, such as the Roy Paul Committee, the Khola Committee and, most recently, the Naresh Chandra Committee in October 2004, have pushed for flexible use of airspace. The IAF's reaction to these recommendations mirrors the polarisation on airspace issues between the civil aviation ministry and the air Force. Senior IAF officers dismiss the recommendations, asking why the Naresh Chandra Committee does not include an IAF representative. ------------ It is probably high time that a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) was appointed urgently to go objectiovel into the issues involved in Indian civil and military aviation and recommend steps for the future which are mandatory on both sides. The model for the JPC must be the non-partisan Base Realignment And Closure (BRAC) process used periodically in the U.S. to decide on military values of bases, their local economic and political impact and the possibility of re-combining bases to economise and yet maintain/enhance military capabilities. There may be a crying need to consolidate and relocate military flight training facilities where they cause minimum disruption to civilian flights while enhancing effectiveness of training.There may also be a need to focus on a fewer number of proven aircraft types to boost flight proficiency and reduce maintenance and overhaul costs. Regarding Dabolim, I recently found out that the Navy operates and even longer runway at an obscure base called INS Rajali at Arakkonam near Chennai. Near Chennai there is also an IAF training station called Tambaram. Why cant some consolidation of flight training take place at Arakkonam? And btw, if some people object to the Navy shifting to Seabird because of eco(logical) problems there, what about the eco(nomic) problems Goa is facing due to unreasonable restrictions at Dabolim? Whose side are you on, friend?