Re: [gobolinux-devel] Re: ChrootCompile and UnionSandbox

2006-05-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On 5/17/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Talking about dependencies, I'm dealing with situations here where they differ depending on the architecture being compiled. After all, we usually don't want tons of extra features on packages for the embedded. I understand why but woul

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Java?

2006-05-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On 5/17/06, Peter Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, I'm no great fan of Java, but I recognize that it's probably something good to have easily and readily available. So will 013 include Java, now that Sun is permitting the binaries to be packaged by distros?[0] :Peter [0] http://www.sun.c

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Re: ChrootCompile and UnionSandbox

2006-05-16 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 5/15/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Different kinds of information that could be written/extracted: * BuildDependencies: handwritten file, in recipe, listing what's needed to build ("GCC [3.0,)") * RuntimeDependencies: handwritten file, in recipe and package, listing what's ne

[gobolinux-devel] Java?

2006-05-16 Thread Peter Clark
    Now, I'm no great fan of Java, but I recognize that it's probably something good to have easily and readily available. So will 013 include Java, now that Sun is permitting the binaries to be packaged by distros?[0]     :Peter [0] http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2006-05/sunflash.2006051

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Re: ChrootCompile and UnionSandbox

2006-05-16 Thread Laurent Pelecq
Le Tue, 16 May 2006 14:31:21 -0300, "Hisham Muhammad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit : > On 5/16/06, Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hisham Muhammad a écrit : > > > On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I say different rev numbers does not make sense. The build > > >>

[gobolinux-devel] Re: ChrootCompile and UnionSandbox

2006-05-16 Thread Hisham Muhammad
On 5/15/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/15/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package r3p1 might be built against GCC 3.3 and r3p2 built against GCC > 4.0, both having been built from the same recipe, r3, which

[gobolinux-devel] Re: ChrootCompile and UnionSandbox

2006-05-16 Thread Hisham Muhammad
On 5/16/06, Laurent Pelecq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hisham Muhammad a écrit : > On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I say different rev numbers does not make sense. The build >> environment should be "fully deterministic". What's the difference between r3p1 and r3p2? Is th

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Re: ChrootCompile and UnionSandbox

2006-05-16 Thread Laurent Pelecq
Hisham Muhammad a écrit : > On 5/13/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I say different rev numbers does not make sense. The build >> environment should be "fully deterministic". What's the difference between r3p1 and r3p2? Is there anyway to know? > > Package r3p1 might be built agai