On 9/29/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:49:28 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Big issue with bootstrap (of init process, not the kernel) is the
> > entire base should use the new system. This way all the events are
> > properly triggere
On 9/29/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:07:48 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Daemon monitoring has some really nice benefits. But it really is
> > swimming upstream against the flow of sysvinit. :-) Many daemons just
> > aren't designed
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:40:11 +0200, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [...] If we at GoboLinux has a patch that isn't already
>> submitted by any of the large distro with rights to redistribute we have
>> to submit it for review before we include it i
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:49:28 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/29/06, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey all
>>
>> Has anyone looked at ubuntu's new 'upstart' init replacement coming out
>> in
>> the new edgy release?
>> It is entirely replacing init for ubuntu
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:07:48 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daemon monitoring has some really nice benefits. But it really is
> swimming upstream against the flow of sysvinit. :-) Many daemons just
> aren't designed to allow it, especially for some advanced features
> (sending
Daemon monitoring has some really nice benefits. But it really is
swimming upstream against the flow of sysvinit. :-) Many daemons just
aren't designed to allow it, especially for some advanced features
(sending signals, logging). This means Tasks are required. Having
two solutions (Tasks and D
On 9/29/06, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all
>
> Has anyone looked at ubuntu's new 'upstart' init replacement coming out in
> the new edgy release?
> It is entirely replacing init for ubuntu
> (Replying directly to you Jonas b/c I don't think the mailing list will let
> my messag
On 9/29/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My fear is that any bugfix going into gobolinux will block on MozCorp
> approval, which is simply unethical when we can do better.
>
I'm not sure that is a practical concern. Who's creating these Gobo
specific bugfixes. Firefox has a strong brand
Hey allHas anyone looked at ubuntu's new 'upstart' init replacement coming out in the new edgy release?It is entirely replacing init for ubuntu(Replying directly to you Jonas b/c I don't think the mailing list will let my message in..)
BenOn 9/28/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] If we at GoboLinux has a patch that isn't already
> submitted by any of the large distro with rights to redistribute we have
> to submit it for review before we include it in our releases (if we want
> to call the browser Firefox), but to me t
10 matches
Mail list logo
