On 7/2/07, Anshuman Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hisham,
> Did you disagree with the alternate location for the Dependency files
> and Links as well as he has described?
My first impression was that his suggestions added to what you
proposed, combining the best aspects of your and Jan's
Hisham,
Did you disagree with the alternate location for the Dependency files
and Links as well as he has described? In general, I'm pushing the links
idea for dependencies for the simple reason(s) below:
...file system as package manager
...any decent package manager needs a way of tracking fo
On 7/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/1/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/2/07, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There was talk back in May of adding USE-flag style functionality to
> > > Compile:
> > >
> > > http://www.wotfun.com/pip
On 7/2/07, Andy Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this proposal is coming too close to "reimplementing a
> database in a filesystem." The point of using the filesystem should be
> to *avoid* having a special central construct just for tracking
> dependencies (or whatever). Ideally, there
I think this proposal is coming too close to "reimplementing a
database in a filesystem." The point of using the filesystem should be
to *avoid* having a special central construct just for tracking
dependencies (or whatever). Ideally, there should just be one method
of storing the dependencies for
similar, but 'gobo' is in the details :)...
If you have the rev links in a subfolder...if the folder is deleted
then the reverse dependencies are lost...the right place is
/System/Links...which can be backed up as needed
The primary concerns in that response are to do with 'maintaining' the
li
On 7/2/07, Anshuman Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I was convinced this (link based) approach is perfect for
> gobo...but the lack of response was worrying me :) ...I will document
> the details on the wiki and send out a link...then if everyone is in
> agreement we can work out a pl
Thanks, I was convinced this (link based) approach is perfect for
gobo...but the lack of response was worrying me :) ...I will document
the details on the wiki and send out a link...then if everyone is in
agreement we can work out a plan of introducing it into gobo scripts.
would appreciate som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am very wary about how this would be determined (thinking about
> community/social/flamewar implications, rather than technical issues).
> I'd rather avoid this can of worms and stick to something that can be
> unequivocall
On Sunday 01 July 2007 18:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is done through a system wide folder:
> /System/Links/Dependencies
*SNIP* Bravo! I like this solution! It seems very Gobo-ish to
me.
:Peter
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-
10 matches
Mail list logo
