On 9/12/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/12/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/12/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I thought that it would be nice to have an option to suppress output, so I
> > > created two new options: '--quiet/-q'
On 9/12/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/12/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I thought that it would be nice to have an option to suppress output, so I
> > created two new options: '--quiet/-q' and '--very-quiet/-Q'. I would have
> > commited this directly
On 9/12/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought that it would be nice to have an option to suppress output, so I
> created two new options: '--quiet/-q' and '--very-quiet/-Q'. I would have
> commited this directly unless there were collisions with the use of the
> '-q' option, nam
"Jonas Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> '-q' option, namingly that SystemFind and UpdateSettings use it as short
> option of '--quick'. My proposal is to change that to '-k' instead.
I suggest renaming SystemFind's --quick/-q to --partial/-p and
UpdateSettings's --quick/-q to --semi-automati
I thought that it would be nice to have an option to suppress output, so I
created two new options: '--quiet/-q' and '--very-quiet/-Q'. I would have
commited this directly unless there were collisions with the use of the
'-q' option, namingly that SystemFind and UpdateSettings use it as short
optio
