On 5/10/08, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I finally solved the problem (if right or wrong, I don't know).
> Attached you'll find the patch, please let me know.
> This way files on which current user has no permissions should be
> correctly managed, as well as globbing (which sud
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I finally solved the problem (if right or wrong, I don't know). Attached
>> you'll find the patch, please let me know.
>> This way files on which current user has no permissions shoul
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I finally solved the problem (if right or wrong, I don't know). Attached
> you'll find the patch, please let me know.
> This way files on which current user has no permissions should be correctly
> managed, as well as
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 May 2008 21:00:01 +0200, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:07 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author
On Fri, 09 May 2008 21:00:01 +0200, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:07 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Author: mwh
>>> Date: 2008-05-09 02:07:37 -0700 (Fri, 09 May 2008)
>>> New Revision: 3
Ok, I finally solved the problem (if right or wrong, I don't know).
Attached you'll find the patch, please let me know.
This way files on which current user has no permissions should be
correctly managed, as well as globbing (which sudo prevents from
working, since the command is first parsed b
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:07 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: mwh
>> Date: 2008-05-09 02:07:37 -0700 (Fri, 09 May 2008)
>> New Revision: 3316
>>
>> Modified:
>> trunk/Scripts/bin/CheckDependencies
>> Log:
>> Fix u
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> An obvious fix is to simply ignore the errors if the offending file is
>> a symlink, as proposed in this patch. Is it ok to commit this, o
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An obvious fix is to simply ignore the errors if the offending file is
> a symlink, as proposed in this patch. Is it ok to commit this, or do
> you want to think in a more elaborated solution? (I'm ok with this
> one
Daniele Maccari wrote:
> Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>>
>> Hey!
>>
>>
>>
>>> I was trying to create a recipe for OpenOffice 2.4.0, so I simply
>>> newversi
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>
> Hey!
>
>
>> I was trying to create a recipe for OpenOffice 2.4.0, so I simply
>> newversioned the preexistent recipe. However, after having manually
>>
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:07 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: mwh
> Date: 2008-05-09 02:07:37 -0700 (Fri, 09 May 2008)
> New Revision: 3316
>
> Modified:
> trunk/Scripts/bin/CheckDependencies
> Log:
> Fix useflags bug with old-style dependencies, and when no flags are enabled
We should pr
Anyway I meant the opposite, if the issue isn't due to some symlink, copying
other system directories (bin and such) should in theory give the same
results.
I'm not at home atm, so you'll have to wait till this evening.
Bye
2008/5/9 Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:2
13 matches
Mail list logo
