On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was trying to create a recipe for openoffice (source) and I ran into the
> problem of performing some tasks just in between configure and make, which
> isn't possible with the current Compile. I then created
Hi all,
I was trying to create a recipe for openoffice (source) and I ran into the
problem of performing some tasks just in between configure and make, which
isn't possible with the current Compile. I then created this patch which
simply run a "post_configure" hook, in the same style as other hook
Michael Homer wrote:
> That is the problem, yes, the directories won't be readable. chmod -R
> a+rX should have fixed that, though.
>
Using `chmod -R a+rX usr opt` worked. No changes in Compile's code
needed :)
> It doesn't seem to be in the attached recipe, so you should put it
> back in. The
Here's the correct recipe.
OpenOffice--2.4.0_bin--recipe.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonas Karlsson wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 May 2008 10:13:00 +0200, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Michael Homer wrote:
On 5/10/08, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I finally solved th
Jonas Karlsson wrote:
On Sat, 10 May 2008 10:13:00 +0200, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Homer wrote:
On 5/10/08, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I finally solved the problem (if right or wrong, I don't know).
Attached you'll find the patch,
On Sat, 10 May 2008 10:13:00 +0200, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Homer wrote:
>> On 5/10/08, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I finally solved the problem (if right or wrong, I don't know).
>>> Attached you'll find the patch, please let me know.
>>> Thi
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Homer wrote:
>> On 5/10/08, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I finally solved the problem (if right or wrong, I don't know).
>>> Attached you'll find the patch, please let me know.
>>> This wa
Michael Homer wrote:
> On 5/10/08, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I finally solved the problem (if right or wrong, I don't know).
>> Attached you'll find the patch, please let me know.
>> This way files on which current user has no permissions should be
>> correctly managed,
