On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> An obvious fix is to simply ignore the errors if the offending file is
>> a symlink, as proposed in this patch. Is it ok to commit this, o
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An obvious fix is to simply ignore the errors if the offending file is
> a symlink, as proposed in this patch. Is it ok to commit this, or do
> you want to think in a more elaborated solution? (I'm ok with this
> one
Hi,
I just came across the so hated problems with Signatures, but this
time I took a few seconds to try to fix it.
FileHash breaks when SignProgram can't resolve symlinks, a situation
which happens (more frequently) when we run SignProgram against a
tarball. In this situation, the non-signed pack
