On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote:
> On 5 February 2010 18:56, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: mohjive
>>> Date: 2010-02-05 09:33:15 -0800 (Fri, 05 Feb 2010)
>>> New Revision: 4331
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> branches/015/Scripts/F
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Jonas Karlsson wrote:
> On 5 February 2010 18:56, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: mohjive
>>> Date: 2010-02-05 09:33:15 -0800 (Fri, 05 Feb 2010)
>>> New Revision: 4331
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> branches/015/Scripts/F
On 5 February 2010 18:56, Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
>> Author: mohjive
>> Date: 2010-02-05 09:33:15 -0800 (Fri, 05 Feb 2010)
>> New Revision: 4331
>>
>> Modified:
>> branches/015/Scripts/Functions/Bootstrap
>> Log:
>> As 'libexec' is not part of FHS th
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
> Author: mohjive
> Date: 2010-02-05 09:33:15 -0800 (Fri, 05 Feb 2010)
> New Revision: 4331
>
> Modified:
> branches/015/Scripts/Functions/Bootstrap
> Log:
> As 'libexec' is not part of FHS there's no point for us using it
Hmm. I've seen some applications