On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/26 Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/9/26 Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/9/26 Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EM
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Clarification:
>>> Generic flags are defined in Settings/G
On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:09, Michael Homer wrote:
> If you don't want to use the generics, turn them off (or just erase
> the file, and you can never even turn them on by accident). If you
> don't want to use a specific one, turn it off. If you don't ever want
> to use a particular potentia
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Clarification:
>> Generic flags are defined in Settings/GenericFlags.conf.
>> Setting flags you do in Data/DistUseFlags.conf, Settings/Use
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clarification:
> Generic flags are defined in Settings/GenericFlags.conf.
> Setting flags you do in Data/DistUseFlags.conf, Settings/UseFlags.conf
> and USE environmental variable.
>
> Flags are parsed and enabled in this
2008/9/22 Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Michael Homer
>>> My distant, high-level perception of the issue: if I don't have
>>> "tcltk" listed in my "gui" flags, or if I have "-tcltk" explicitly
>>> listed in my flags configuration, then I _really_ don't want to see
>
(I am faking the quoting manually because gmail's mobile client
doesn't do inline well. Hopefully it's comprehensible.)
> Scenario 1: if dist flags sets "gui: qt gtk tcltk" and system flags
> sets "+gui" and I run "USE=-tcltk" on a recipe that has an optional
> Tcl/Tk GUI, do I get a Tcl/Tk GUI bu
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My main concern is that the answer for scenario 1 is "no".
I may have phrased this badly. What I meant is:
I only want to make sure that the answer for scenario 1 is "no" (ie,
generic flags set by upper levels shouldn't bring u
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Michael Homer
>> My distant, high-level perception of the issue: if I don't have
>> "tcltk" listed in my "gui" flags, or if I have "-tcltk" explicitly
>> listed in my flags configuration, then I _really_ don't want to see
>> any optional Tcl/Tk GUIs being built from
On Monday 22 September 2008 16:50:21 Hisham wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Michael Homer > The solution to this
> "problem" is that you don't enable generic flags
>
> > you don't want to use, and you don't list programs you don't want to
> > use as part of the generics you *do* want to u
2008/9/22 Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Michael Homer > The solution to this
> "problem" is that you don't enable generic flags
>> you don't want to use, and you don't list programs you don't want to
>> use as part of the generics you *do* want to use. If you want t
2008/9/22 Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> After a long discussion on IRC (mostly between Michael and me) two
>> views on how general flags should behave have emerged. Since Michael
>> and me is of different opinions we woul
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Michael Homer > The solution to this
"problem" is that you don't enable generic flags
> you don't want to use, and you don't list programs you don't want to
> use as part of the generics you *do* want to use. If you want to use a
> specific implementation for a part
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a long discussion on IRC (mostly between Michael and me) two
> views on how general flags should behave have emerged. Since Michael
> and me is of different opinions we would like some more input on this
> topic.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hope to get some input on this and in the end come to a consensus.
> It seems the two states of set and unset aren't enough. How does
> adding a
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A problem with this approach is that there's no way to reset a generic
> flag to the default behaviour. If +bbb is set there is no way to reset
> "aaa" to selecting from the full "bbb ccc ddd" group. Currently just
> spe
On Sunday 21 September 2008 21:35:19 Jonas Karlsson wrote:
> After a long discussion on IRC (mostly between Michael and me) two
> views on how general flags should behave have emerged. Since Michael
> and me is of different opinions we would like some more input on this
> topic.
Further explanation
After a long discussion on IRC (mostly between Michael and me) two
views on how general flags should behave have emerged. Since Michael
and me is of different opinions we would like some more input on this
topic.
Currently we have three levels of use flags, were each lower level
override an higher
21 matches
Mail list logo
