2008/8/18 Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How is the switch to PAM going?
> Is there a package or recipe for Shadow with PAM support?
>
Just set the +pam use flag and recompile shadow and everything
should work (tm)
--
/Jonas
___
gobolinux-deve
How is the switch to PAM going?
Is there a package or recipe for Shadow with PAM support?
--
/Jonatan [ http://kymatica.com ]
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/goboli
On 01/04/2008, Nick Matteo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MJ Ray makes an interesting point: Requiring PAM, and putting all
> this in a pam.d/common-session sourced from pam.d/other, would really
> be an ideal solution. This could guarantee that all sessions
> (interactive, noninteractive, logi
