Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On 7/28/06, Sean Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The discussion was about providing recipes which download non-OpenSource >> binaries, but the concept is the same. > > > I'm not against that. It might be better, though, to store such > recipes in a different store, or to make sure that a license text > appears so that the user aggrees on that before proceeding with its > installation/compilation.
That would be very nice. Maybe a special recipe type? And a Resources/LICENSE file... And then the pre/post_install hooks can be used to set things up so it works as it should in gobolinux. This would be useful for many binary-only packages: firefox, thunderbird, openoffice, realplayer, flashplayer, google-earth, etc... And there should not be any legal issues since we don't distribute the binaries, only a plain-text recipe of how to download and install them, right? -- /Jonatan -=( http://kymatica.com )=- _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
