On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/26 Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/9/26 Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2008/9/26 Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EM
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Clarification:
>>> Generic flags are defined in Settings/G
On Thursday 25 September 2008 18:09, Michael Homer wrote:
> If you don't want to use the generics, turn them off (or just erase
> the file, and you can never even turn them on by accident). If you
> don't want to use a specific one, turn it off. If you don't ever want
> to use a particular potentia
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Clarification:
>> Generic flags are defined in Settings/GenericFlags.conf.
>> Setting flags you do in Data/DistUseFlags.conf, Settings/Use
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clarification:
> Generic flags are defined in Settings/GenericFlags.conf.
> Setting flags you do in Data/DistUseFlags.conf, Settings/UseFlags.conf
> and USE environmental variable.
>
> Flags are parsed and enabled in this
2008/9/22 Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Michael Homer
>>> My distant, high-level perception of the issue: if I don't have
>>> "tcltk" listed in my "gui" flags, or if I have "-tcltk" explicitly
>>> listed in my flags configuration, then I _really_ don't want to see
>
(I am faking the quoting manually because gmail's mobile client
doesn't do inline well. Hopefully it's comprehensible.)
> Scenario 1: if dist flags sets "gui: qt gtk tcltk" and system flags
> sets "+gui" and I run "USE=-tcltk" on a recipe that has an optional
> Tcl/Tk GUI, do I get a Tcl/Tk GUI bu
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My main concern is that the answer for scenario 1 is "no".
I may have phrased this badly. What I meant is:
I only want to make sure that the answer for scenario 1 is "no" (ie,
generic flags set by upper levels shouldn't bring u
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Michael Homer
>> My distant, high-level perception of the issue: if I don't have
>> "tcltk" listed in my "gui" flags, or if I have "-tcltk" explicitly
>> listed in my flags configuration, then I _really_ don't want to see
>> any optional Tcl/Tk GUIs being built from
On Monday 22 September 2008 16:50:21 Hisham wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Michael Homer > The solution to this
> "problem" is that you don't enable generic flags
>
> > you don't want to use, and you don't list programs you don't want to
> > use as part of the generics you *do* want to u
2008/9/22 Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Michael Homer > The solution to this
> "problem" is that you don't enable generic flags
>> you don't want to use, and you don't list programs you don't want to
>> use as part of the generics you *do* want to use. If you want t
2008/9/22 Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> After a long discussion on IRC (mostly between Michael and me) two
>> views on how general flags should behave have emerged. Since Michael
>> and me is of different opinions we woul
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Michael Homer > The solution to this
"problem" is that you don't enable generic flags
> you don't want to use, and you don't list programs you don't want to
> use as part of the generics you *do* want to use. If you want to use a
> specific implementation for a part
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a long discussion on IRC (mostly between Michael and me) two
> views on how general flags should behave have emerged. Since Michael
> and me is of different opinions we would like some more input on this
> topic.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hope to get some input on this and in the end come to a consensus.
> It seems the two states of set and unset aren't enough. How does
> adding a
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A problem with this approach is that there's no way to reset a generic
> flag to the default behaviour. If +bbb is set there is no way to reset
> "aaa" to selecting from the full "bbb ccc ddd" group. Currently just
> spe
On Sunday 21 September 2008 21:35:19 Jonas Karlsson wrote:
> After a long discussion on IRC (mostly between Michael and me) two
> views on how general flags should behave have emerged. Since Michael
> and me is of different opinions we would like some more input on this
> topic.
Further explanation
20 matches
Mail list logo
