On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/19/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Right. I'm ok with 014.1. Or maybe 014.01, then 014.10 and then
> > 014.11. No more than 3 bug fix releases would be allowed in this case
> > ;-)
> >
>
> I l
On 3/20/08, Paul Dann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Surely, after 014.11 would come 014.100? So it's not limited to three.
> Also, isn't it a little odd to mix octal and binary? Maybe 014.1...014.7,
> 014.10, etc...
i dont think mixing octal and binary is odd... people already know its
not dec
Surely, after 014.11 would come 014.100? So it's not limited to three.
Also, isn't it a little odd to mix octal and binary? Maybe
014.1...014.7, 014.10, etc...
Carlo Calica wrote:
On 3/19/08, Lucas C. Villa Real<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right. I'm ok with 014.1. Or maybe 014.01, then
On 3/19/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right. I'm ok with 014.1. Or maybe 014.01, then 014.10 and then
> 014.11. No more than 3 bug fix releases would be allowed in this case
> ;-)
>
I like this.
--
Carlo J. Calica
___
gobolin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I notice the "014.b" name is gaining traction. I strongly suggest to
> > use a more obvious name, such as "014.1". The "b" can be conf
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I notice the "014.b" name is gaining traction. I strongly suggest to
> use a more obvious name, such as "014.1". The "b" can be confused as
> meanining "beta".
I thought we'd settled on 014A long ago, to be honest. Alth
