On 7/24/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Modified files:
Scripts/bin: CheckDependencies
Log message:
Dependencies.blacklist support. Hardcoded Glibc as blacklisted.
Is there a default Dependencies.blacklist somewhere out there?
I have some reminding of Glibc bei
On 7/25/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/24/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Modified files:
> Scripts/bin: CheckDependencies
>
> Log message:
> Dependencies.blacklist support. Hardcoded Glibc as blacklisted.
Is there a default Dependencies.blackl
On 7/23/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ObjectiveC support is going to be added to default GCC binary package.
Can someone prepare and test an updated recipe? New recipe should be
based on the current GCC 4.1.1 recipe.
I'm doing that right now.
--
Lucas
powered by /dev/dsp
On 7/25/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just commited a Dependencies.blacklist some few minutes ago. Feel
free to remove the hardcoded entry now.
I guess its better to keep it for a while, since there are a lot of
recipes now with glibc 2.4 dependency, and people may not
On 7/25/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/25/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just commited a Dependencies.blacklist some few minutes ago. Feel
> free to remove the hardcoded entry now.
I guess its better to keep it for a while, since there are a lot of
re
On 7/25/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/23/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ObjectiveC support is going to be added to default GCC binary package.
> Can someone prepare and test an updated recipe? New recipe should be
> based on the current GCC 4.1.1 recipe.
Hi there,
I'm doing a cleanup in the Network tasks here in order to reduce the
amount of replicated code. Is there any objections on moving the
contents of NetworkInterface to the Network script? The only
difference visible to end users is that, instead of running 'StartTask
NetworkInterface eth1
On 7/25/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm doing a cleanup in the Network tasks here in order to reduce the
amount of replicated code.
That's good.
Is there any objections on moving the
contents of NetworkInterface to the Network script? The only
difference visible to end u
Just wanted to report that 'Compile Zim' works with latest Compile and
Scripts. Thanks!
--
/Jonatan - http://kymatica.com
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
"Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 7/25/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/23/06, Andr=E9 Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ObjectiveC support is going to be added to default GCC binary package.
> > > Can someone prepare and test an updated recipe? New rec
On 7/25/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 7/25/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/23/06, Andr=E9 Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ObjectiveC support is going to be added to default GCC binary package.
> > > Can som
Does anyone have an objection to me permanently banning IP addresses
that spam the wiki?
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On 7/25/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have an objection to me permanently banning IP addresses
that spam the wiki?
No. I've seen today the "latest changes" in the wiki and it was sad to
see that many of them were related to spam.
--
Lucas
powered by /dev/dsp
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
