I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type= instead
of is_=yes. Before I commit I have some questions. The
variable name; as it is inside the recipe, "type" should be clear enough,
but as the word "type" is a reserved word, it can be used as a variable
but I don't like it, maybe "i
I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type=
instead of is_=yes.
I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there?
Before I commit I have some questions. The variable name; as it is
inside the recipe, "type" should be clear enough, but as the word
"type" is a re
On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type=
> instead of is_=yes.
I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there?
I hope so, too :-)
> Before I commit I have some questions. The variable name; as it is
> inside the re
On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type=
> instead of is_=yes.
I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there?
I assume the same, of course.
This is a big change wrt compatibility, but one I've been thinking
about f
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 22:48:33 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type=
> instead of is_=yes.
I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there?
I assume the same, of
On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's a really good question. Unless someone has an objection, I
>> also vote for
>>
>> recipe_type=autoconf
>
> I don't have a definite vote for this, but I'd be leaning betwe
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 23:22:10 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's a really good question. Unless someone has an objection, I
>> also vote for
>>
>> recip
On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 23:22:10 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> That's a really good question. Unl