[gobolinux-devel] Recipe types

2006-08-03 Thread Jonas Karlsson
I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type= instead of is_=yes. Before I commit I have some questions. The variable name; as it is inside the recipe, "type" should be clear enough, but as the word "type" is a reserved word, it can be used as a variable but I don't like it, maybe "i

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Recipe types

2006-08-03 Thread Dan
I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type= instead of is_=yes. I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there? Before I commit I have some questions. The variable name; as it is inside the recipe, "type" should be clear enough, but as the word "type" is a re

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Recipe types

2006-08-03 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type= > instead of is_=yes. I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there? I hope so, too :-) > Before I commit I have some questions. The variable name; as it is > inside the re

[gobolinux-devel] Re: Recipe types

2006-08-03 Thread Hisham Muhammad
On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type= > instead of is_=yes. I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there? I assume the same, of course. This is a big change wrt compatibility, but one I've been thinking about f

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Re: Recipe types

2006-08-03 Thread Jonas Karlsson
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 22:48:33 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm about to commit a change to Compile to use type= > instead of is_=yes. I assume you have some facility for backwards-compatibility in there? I assume the same, of

[gobolinux-devel] Re: Recipe types

2006-08-03 Thread Hisham Muhammad
On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's a really good question. Unless someone has an objection, I >> also vote for >> >> recipe_type=autoconf > > I don't have a definite vote for this, but I'd be leaning betwe

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Re: Recipe types

2006-08-03 Thread Jonas Karlsson
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 23:22:10 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's a really good question. Unless someone has an objection, I >> also vote for >> >> recip

[gobolinux-devel] Re: Recipe types

2006-08-03 Thread Hisham Muhammad
On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 23:22:10 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/3/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > On 8/3/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> That's a really good question. Unl