[gobolinux-devel] Firefox branding

2006-09-28 Thread Jonas Karlsson
Reading the Wikipedia page about Mozilla Firefox, I found this: "Although Firefox uses open source core software, free licensing does not extend to the artwork. For this reason, software distributors who distribute patched or modified versions of Firefox cannot use the Firefox icon. However,

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Firefox branding

2006-09-28 Thread MJ Ray
Please do not rely on Wikipedia! Any idiot can edit it and many do. The most recent thing I have seen about Firefox's trademark is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622 which also suggests Gerv is no longer relevant. Even if we can call it Firefox now (hurrah! but would it limi

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Firefox branding

2006-09-28 Thread Jonas Karlsson
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:53:52 +0200, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please do not rely on Wikipedia! Any idiot can edit it and many do. > I wasn't relying on the quote, but more on the reference attached to it. But as you later state Gerv has nothing to do with the licensing any more. > The

[gobolinux-devel] Daemons/Tasks on startup

2006-09-28 Thread Jonas Karlsson
I'm updating the recipe for Bind and I thinking on how to start named. Should it be a task or a daemon. Do we still use daemons? And while on the subject, shouldn't we have a simple way to start Tasks/Daemons at bootup, such as a list in BootOptions or a rc-dir with symlinks? Another note is