2007/9/14, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/13/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/13/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/13/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
> > > > Module name:
2007/9/13, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/12/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/12/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/12/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I thought that it would be nice to have an option to suppre
I think I spotted a package for Ion appear. If that's the one from
http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/ion/download.html
be aware that the author claims Ion is a trademark and is generally
pretty offensive about distribution packages.
The debian changelog includes:
ion3 (20070506-1) unstable; urgency=lo
2007/9/14, Aitor Pérez Iturri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> El Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:36:19 +0100
> MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió
>
> > I think I spotted a package for Ion appear. If that's the one from
> > http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/ion/download.html
> > be aware that the author claims Ion is a tradem
El Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:36:19 +0100
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió
> I think I spotted a package for Ion appear. If that's the one from
> http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/ion/download.html
> be aware that the author claims Ion is a trademark and is generally
> pretty offensive about distribution pac
Aitor Pérez Iturri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we don't add any significant addition, but i can't understand
> ver well if we should call our packages Ion or Ion3, I think that we
> agree with the intence of the license, but we can ask the autor
> directly.
>
> what do you think about?
I
2007/9/14, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aitor Pérez Iturri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think we don't add any significant addition, but i can't understand
> > ver well if we should call our packages Ion or Ion3, I think that we
> > agree with the intence of the license, but we can ask the aut
"Jonas Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] but I do not know how a Recipe should be considered in
> form of distribution as wwe still do not have a package.
Worst case, it's a derived work, depending on the creativity of the
internals of the upstream package.
Best case, we only need worr
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:50:08 +0100
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems self-contradictory to me, because LGPL-2.1 says "You may
> not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the
> rights granted herein." By saying we may not impose any further
> restrictions *and*
Hisham Muhammad wrote:
> On 9/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hisham,
>> Any ideas on this yet? I haven't gone through the differences in the Udev
>> rules but it looks like something has changed which is not letting my
>> system boot off the USB disk? Not a good bug to cont
On 9/14/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:50:08 +0100
> MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This seems self-contradictory to me, because LGPL-2.1 says "You may
> > not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the
> > rights gr
Jonas Karlsson wrote:
> 2007/9/13, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Things like this happens quite often:
>>
> Apparantly it does, but I have never been able to duplicate it. So
> hunting donw this bug is quite difficult.
>
>> InstallPackage: Downloading package to
>> /System/Variable/tmp
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:25:50 +0200, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonas Karlsson wrote:
>> 2007/9/13, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Things like this happens quite often:
>>>
>> Apparantly it does, but I have never been able to duplicate it. So
>> hunting donw this bug
MLA-Gobo wrote:
> Since 014 is delayed, could the kernel be compiled using the latest
> forcedeth driver (available at
> http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_nforce_1.23.html)? It should just be a
> drop-in replacement for whatever version of forcedeth.c is currently in the
> kernel source. It's
14 matches
Mail list logo
