Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-01-22 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "Neal Gompa" Hi, Thanks for the review ! > I really do like this. There are only two issues I have with it: > 1. This seems to mandate that all packages must be named by their > import path. My golang package (snapd) is not, intentionally so. I > don't want to c

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-01-22 Thread Jakub Cajka
- Original Message - > From: "Marcin Dulak" > To: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 4:04:19 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re:

Re: short spec file of binary package

2018-01-22 Thread Jan Chaloupka
Hi Germano, you can try https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/runc/blob/master/f/runc.spec. Is there something specific you would like to know? Regards Jan On 01/19/2018 12:33 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: Hi, I am studying packaging guidelines of binary software written in Go language. Actually