ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that
was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
I mean, if it is trivial - just commit it. I this not first PR where this
happens.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
http
nim commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
@ignatenkobrain sorry, I didn't know there was much interest in reviewing such
a trivial commit (or in go-rpm-macros PRs in general). If you have any comment
on t
ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that
was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
I would appreciate if you would not merge your own PRs in one minute after
opening.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https
nim opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following:
``
make it use the actual code that was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/16
___
nim merged a pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
make it use the actual code that was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/16
___
golang mailing
