2013/10/28 Matthew Miller :
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:31:15PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>> Otherwise it looks quite good - everything works well. Also from the
>> visible changes the resulting binaries are significantly smaller (from
>> megabytes to hundreds of kilobytes) if anyone still care
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:31:15PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Otherwise it looks quite good - everything works well. Also from the
> visible changes the resulting binaries are significantly smaller (from
> megabytes to hundreds of kilobytes) if anyone still care about this.
Is this due to dyna
Hello All!
I've been using gccgo from GCC 4.8.2 (which fully supports 1.1.2 as
they claimed) for a while now and I've got something to share with
you.
First of all I was surprised that there is a lot of source code
duplication. GCC' libgo/go directory contains the entire
golang/src/pkg directory
