This may not be what you want, but starting from Go 1.9 it's possible to
declare a type alias using the syntax
type MyString = string
As opposed to a type definition, an alias declaration doesn't create a new
distinct type different from the type it's created from. Type aliases are
not meant t
It won't serve index.html file by default like in case of
neuteredReaddirFile
On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:38:22 AM UTC+5:30, George Armhold wrote:
>
> I've settled on the following, which has the added benefit of returning 404
> for directories.
>
>
> Corrections appreciated.
>
>
>
> type
Hi arschles,
I am go-lang beginner programmer
I am working on google compute engine API where createinstnace()
method internally call authentication sign() function which print URL to
visit and accept authentication code and generate and return oauth token
which I used in createinst
I see, thank you!
On Saturday, June 24, 2017 at 5:46:55 PM UTC-7, Ayan George wrote:
>
>
> On 06/24/2017 08:16 PM, Ivan Bertona wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > When I try to compile this piece of code:
> >
>
> I think it violates the second assignability rule since both 'string'
> and MyString are
On 06/24/2017 08:16 PM, Ivan Bertona wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I try to compile this piece of code:
>
I think it violates the second assignability rule since both 'string'
and MyString are named types. string happens to be a a pre-declared
named type:
https://golang.org/ref/spec#Assignability
Hello,
When I try to compile this piece of code:
package main
type MyString string
type MyBytes []byte
func GetString() (string, error) {
return "", nil
}
func GetBytes() ([]byte, error) {
return nil, nil
}
func main() {
var s MyString
var b MyBytes
var err error
s, err = GetString()
b, err
Do you use gvm? https://github.com/moovweb/gvm
Is there a simpler way?
How do you avoid conflicts with Homebrew? Should I not run 'brew install
go'?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiv
Might want to ask on a java mailing list not a golang one ;-)
On 24/06/2017 13:09, Manish Asolkar wrote:
hi,
I have two Window machines one has *Server 2008 R2* and another on has
*Server 2012 R2* with same *JDK version 1.8.*
I am working on a financial application where I receive a base64
I am working on creating an android app entirely in go using the Java og
bindings, as outlined in
https://github.com/golang/mobile/tree/master/example/reverse
I created a go project under my goroot and an android project in my
~/AndroidStuioProjects
I seem to have the configs right but I seem to
hi,
I have two Window machines one has *Server 2008 R2* and another on has *Server
2012 R2* with same *JDK version 1.8.*
I am working on a financial application where I receive a base64 encoded
public encrypted value which I need to decode using Base64, decrypt and
validate.
My program is
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:43 AM, wrote:
> The goal of a (proper) router is to decouple routes from handlers, thus
> making refactoring easier by adopting a declarative form rather than an
> imperative one.
>
Yes. And it is my opinion that this is a bad thing.
> It's the good old builder patte
The goal of a (proper) router is to decouple routes from handlers, thus
making refactoring easier by adopting a declarative form rather than an
imperative one. It's the good old builder pattern. By deeming it
unnecessary you did nothing but couple your handlers with your routes.
That's the only
Yeah, I do. And that's what I get for not testing my code, this is the
second mistake someone found :) Thanks for noticing it, I'll push a fix in
a minute.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Steve Roth wrote:
> Hello, Axel,
>
> I like your concept and I am applying it. But I believe that the code
13 matches
Mail list logo
