Thanks for the detailed responses everyone. I think weak-refs are
definitely a good idea that could work for my use case here. I'll explore
more of that implementation.
@christian yeah, good point about the ticker not catching them. I think
I'll try a more manual memory counting approach here s
I strongly agree this would be beneficial. I’ve discussed this exact concept
with my employer before, because it’s an area we have scanners for with older
languages, but not Go.
I do believe Snyk offers a commercial version of this service, but a public,
official, well-vetted repository that is
I have a long running test where I would like to set the testing package
timeout to 30 minutes from with the my_test.go code.
This would prevent me from forgetting to add the timeout flag, and then
discovering 10 minutes later that it was needed.
Is this possible? Or just a way to disable the t
This is actually SoftRef - which are like a WeakRef but they are only collected
under memory pressure.
If the WeakRef package works, I assume it could be modified to enable “soft
ref” like functionality. It was my understanding that you need GC/runtime
support to truly make this work, but maybe
Robert Engels :
> This is solved pretty easily in Java using soft references and a hard memory
> cap.
That'd be nice, but the onnly weak-references package I've found doesn't seem
to allow
more than one weakref per target. That's really annoying, because my use case is
a target object for a man
In https://research.swtch.com/vgo-why-versions, Russ Cox wrote about
an hypothetical database of bugs in Go modules.
A tool can query the database, extracting the list of modules used in a
binary built with Go.
Such a tool can be probably be written today, using, as an example,
https://www.cved
This is solved pretty easily in Java using soft references and a hard memory
cap.
Similar techniques may work here.
> On Jan 20, 2020, at 11:22 AM, Christian Mauduit wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> That is a generic question and I think that if you want to keep an approach
> with a "global indicator o
Hi,
That is a generic question and I think that if you want to keep an
approach with a "global indicator of how much memory is used", your
approach is OK. You might also want to store this information of "should
I throttle" in a cache or something, the cache could be just a shared
atomic flag
As responses coming from upstream server, because my application acting as
proxy server and it will not have visibility of the fields of the
responses coming.
So, think appending the characters to meet JSON format is only way. Am I
right assuming so?
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 4:07 PM Tamás Gulácsi
Hi folks,
I am trying to figure out if someone has a decent solution for max memory
usage/mem-pressure so far. I went through some of the github issues related
to this (SetMaxHeap proposals and related discussions) but most of them are
still under review:
- https://go-review.googlesource.co
On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 12:26:38 PM UTC+1, Tamás Gulácsi wrote:
>
> Why do you want to pin to a commit when everything is in flux - develop
> locally?
Because to decide when the API is good for publication I want to use it in
1+ projects.
Since the local development period may be long,
Why do you want to pin to a commit when everything is in flux - develop locally?
The replace directive uses the current code when you declare it as a local
path, not the version specified in the "require" section!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"go
So this is impossible with per package modules in one repo?
вс, 19 янв. 2020 г. в 02:39, Vasiliy Tolstov :
>
> Hi! I have one repo with multiple packages. For each package i have
> dedicated go.mod (this is a requirement because repo is collection of
> plugins with many deps).
> How to run test f
>> Why not just the replace directive in go.mod?
>
> With the replace directive to a local module, the version is ignored and the
> go tool always use the latest commit.
How are you envisaging that local modules be addressed by commit,
given the target is a directory (where by definition only a s
Please define "better".
For complexity and speed, appending "[", inserting ",", and appending "]"
at the end is the simplest and fastest solution.
If you want to check for syntax and completeness, then you should
unmarshal, append, and then marshal again.
But if not needed, it's just complexity
https://github.com/e-wrks/edh#program-concurrency-and-data-consistency-as-a-whole
I'm the author of Edh FYI, just released it to public.
Best regards,
Compl
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and sto
Yes, I also need to put '[' at first and ']' at last position. But I was
checking if there is any better way to do it. I was even having question
how can someone make it better without unmarshalling JSON and remarshalling
merged object.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 4:12 AM Tamás Gulácsi wrote:
> Jus
This is cool but the post feels like you are just listing code, without
much in the way of explanation of what those code blocks are doing, why you
need them and what purpose they have in the grand scheme of the project - I
know there is a small paragraph for each one, but I don't think that is
eno
18 matches
Mail list logo
