Connections are indeed reused where possible by default in the Go standard
library.
But as http (before http2) does not support multiplexing, it is not
possible to reuse
a connection which is still in use (i.e. which is still in the process of
reading the response).
These means that the body of
https://play.golang.org/p/Sga78gMLn-9
You can then use it like './mycli -d stream -rt'
The '-d' option is a shared flag, and `-rt' is dedicated for the subcommand
'stream'.
On Wednesday, May 6, 2020 at 8:08:25 PM UTC+8, Chris Burkert wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I'd like to mix shared flags with
On 2020-05-06 18:03, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> If you use log.SetOutput within a go routine, even if you delay main to make
>> sure there is no race. Then mains following log.Print and following
>> functions or
>> executions log output are not redirected?
> If you expect this should work
Seems it
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:32 AM Richard Gong wrote:
>
> Yes, I noticed that the optimization passes are concise as compared to other
> compilers, especially those "Sea of Nodes" compilers. Gc's escape analysis
> and inlining were based on AST. Do you think it's a drawback for deeper
>
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:02 AM Pavan wrote:
>
> Thanks Ian. I start some 20 go routines and each routine involves calling C
> functions and finally all go routines terminate. since each goroutine uses
> LockOSThread at the begining, all the pthreads spawned as part of goroutines
> exit too.
>
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:31 AM dubadub wrote:
>
> I'm trying to compile hello.go on an old(-ish) Linux but getting a random
> error every time: "fatal error: unexpected signal during runtime execution"
> or "fatal error: runtimer: bad p".
>
> I appreciate any idea where to dig.
>
What version
I wrote a small program that runs a repeated GET against a given URL.
However, the DisableKeepAlives boolean does not seem to be honored. Code is
similar to this:
transport := {
DisableKeepAlives: false,
}
client := {
Transport: transport,
}
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
_, err :=
I would do (and have done) what you suggested in your last example, but
just put the codes into a 'var' block as opposed to a const block, e.g.:
var (
>E270_01 = ErrorCode{"270.01", "this is error description"}
)
I would not personally be concerned about people modifying that public
On 2020-05-06 17:57, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> If you use log.SetOutput within a go routine, even if you delay main to make
> sure there is no race. Then mains following log.Print and following functions
> or
> executions log output are not redirected?
If you expect this should work then perhaps I
On 2020-05-06 16:54, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Sorry, can you show an example of what you mean? As far as I can
> tell, you can call log.SetOutput multiple times, and it will affect
> all subsequent output of the standard logger, up to the next call to
> log.SetOutput.
Indeed and I am perfectly
Thanks Ian. I start some 20 go routines and each routine involves calling C
functions and finally all go routines terminate. since each goroutine uses
LockOSThread at the begining, all the pthreads spawned as part of
goroutines exit too.
Now i see around 34 goroutines, few of them have stack
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 8:44 AM Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> "https://godoc.org/log#SetOutput":
> "SetOutput sets the output destination for the standard logger."
>
> To me, without clarification, I assumed it would be globally re-directable at
> multiple times if desired, but it is only globally
Hi,
via *swagger generate client -f file.json* I have created client side
golang codes. The question is how can I use those generated codes for each
REST API in my golang project as consumer.
As a golang/swagger-newbie an example would be appreciated.
Thanks
Larisa
--
You received this
"https://godoc.org/log#SetOutput":
"SetOutput sets the output destination for the standard logger."
To me, without clarification, I assumed it would be globally re-directable at
multiple times if desired, but it is only globally effective when ran early from
main.
I don't understand why it is
See how pkg https://go.dev/github.com/peterbourgon/ff/v3/ffcli does it
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Dear all,
I'd like to mix shared flags with flags specific to flag sets (cooltool
). However I struggle to parse the
shared flags only and pass the rest to the flagset for parsing. Here is
what I came up with:
https://play.golang.org/p/Jazn3aSX9-d
Do I have to pick a different flag library or
well done. Expect it to be merged. Thanks.
在 2020年5月6日星期三 UTC+8下午7:18:21，Than McIntosh写道：
>
> >This seems to be the synchronization problem of gollvm and llvm, I am
> fixing it today, if you have not done it, I can help.
>
> Thanks, I have started a CL for this -- it is at
>
>This seems to be the synchronization problem of gollvm and llvm, I am
fixing it today, if you have not done it, I can help.
Thanks, I have started a CL for this -- it is at
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/gollvm/+/232497 if you want to look it
over. Not quite done yet, still a few things to
This seems to be the synchronization problem of gollvm and llvm, I am
fixing it today, if you have not done it, I can help.
在 2020年5月5日星期二 UTC+8下午8:30:14，Than McIntosh写道：
>
> OK, thanks for that. I will investigate, this looks unrelated to the
> previous problem. Stay tuned.
>
> Cheers, Than
>
Thank you for your information, Ian.
Yes, I noticed that the optimization passes are concise as compared to
other compilers, especially those "Sea of Nodes" compilers. Gc's escape
analysis and inlining were based on AST. Do you think it's a drawback for
deeper optimization? Any future plan to
20 matches
Mail list logo
