yeah，this is really a subtle point, Thank You For Your Addition.
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 10:11 PM, Marvin Renich wrote:
>
> Marvin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:11 PM Yonatan Gizachew wrote:
>
> I see. If that is so, what is the job of sysmon thread?
The sysmon thread is not related to asynchronous preemption. The
sysmon thread does a few different things. One of the things it does
is notice threads that have been stuck in a sy
There is also a command-line proof-of-concept that combines it with
profiling information to show you only the missed/unabled optimizations
that are also hot spots in the profile.
https://github.com/dr2chase/gc-lsp-tools
There's a lot of checks and things that can't be optimized away, but very
fe
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:57 PM aind...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I agree that this functionality can be implemented outside the standard
> library. However, traversing nested data structures does seem to fall into
> reflect's domain. In particular, one would have to deal with unexported
> fields and
I agree that this functionality can be implemented outside the standard
library. However, traversing nested data structures does seem to fall into
reflect's domain. In particular, one would have to deal with unexported
fields and pointer cycles.
I can also see how a newcomer would think the sta
And gopls will compute them as diagnostics. For instance, if using vscode
and gopls, then in setting.json:
"gopls": {
"codelens": {
"gc_details": true,
}
}
and a clickable 'Toggle gc annotation details' should appear just above the
package statement.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:28 PM Ian Lan
[ + drchase ]
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:16 PM Falco Wockenfuß wrote:
>
> sorry if this is a dumb question, but the Release Notes for go 1.15 have the
> Note:
> The compiler's -json optimization logging now reports large (>= 128 byte)
> copies and includes explanations of escape analysis decision
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:11 PM aind...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Often on my team, Go programmers (particularly new ones) simply want full
> visibility into a data structure when debugging. For those who aren't
> familiar with pointers, seeing a hexadecimal number show up in a log can be
> really fr
Hi,
sorry if this is a dumb question, but the Release Notes for go 1.15 have
the Note:
The compiler's -json optimization logging now reports large (>= 128 byte)
copies and includes explanations of escape analysis decisions.
But I didn't find anything about "-json" as a flag for go build or sim
Often on my team, Go programmers (particularly new ones) simply want full
visibility into a data structure when debugging. For those who aren't
familiar with pointers, seeing a hexadecimal number show up in a log can be
really frustrating. I usually point them
to https://github.com/davecgh/go-s
> But I don't think that using type list constraint as sum types is good
idea.
> Type constraints should be known in compile-time, but the sum type
variant should be known in run-time.
It looks like you misunderstand it a bit. Indeed
type Constraint interface {
type Type₁, Type₂, …, Typeₙ
}
I'd like to see sum types in Go2 and there are many reasons:
- It can make using oneOf/anyOf in protobuf or swagger mush easier.
- It can make ast.Node type-safe.
- With sum-types compiler known maximum size of variant, so it can be
allocated on stack, not on heap.
But I don't think that using
Oh wow, my email client showed your email in a truncated way, so i didn't
see you were already using my project, sorry for the silly response.
It would be possible to add external type definitions to oapi-codegen, I
believe. I'm in the process of thinking about a v2 version which is more
stable, a
Have you considered reversing the workflow? You write the OpenAPI spec, and
have a code generator produce the Schemas and server boilerplate?
If that's ok, check out my project :)
https://github.com/deepmap/oapi-codegen
We successfully use it for many API's in production.
-- Marcin
On Thu, Sep
* Yuu LongXue [200904 05:31]:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m confused by the "method set" defined in go
> specification，any one can help explain?
>
> The Go Programming Language Specification says that :
> ```
> The method set of any other type T consists of all methods
>
Hi
I wrote a tool to generate the tag values as string constant.
It can filter out the structs to be parsed, based on a magic comment(if
needed).
Do you feel this can be of any use? May I have your opinion on this?
https://github.com/amarjeetanandsingh/tgcon
--
You received this message becau
I find the mcall function!
On Friday, September 4, 2020 at 6:13:54 PM UTC+8 xie cui wrote:
> as we know, call function gogo can jump to other other goroutine. when
> goroutine1 switch to goroutine2 it must save the current context of
> goroutine1(sp pc. so). i can find the function runtime·gosa
as we know, call function gogo can jump to other other goroutine. when
goroutine1 switch to goroutine2 it must save the current context of
goroutine1(sp pc. so). i can find the function runtime·gosave to save
current context, but i cann't find where the code call gosave, can some
explain when
On Friday, 4 September 2020 10:31:11 UTC+1, Yuu LongXue wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’m confused by the "method set" defined in go specification，any
> one can help explain?
>
> The Go Programming Language Specification says that :
> ```
> The method set of any other
Hi all,
I’m confused by the "method set" defined in go specification，any one
can help explain?
The Go Programming Language Specification says that :
```
The method set of any other type T consists of all methods declared
with receiver type T. The method set of th
20 matches
Mail list logo
