Dnia 2021-02-06, o godz. 12:24:59
Martin Schnabel napisał(a):
> > A "remove element from _slice_" operation always must make a new array
> > and copy all elements that you intend to stay. Current idiom using append
> > will do this for you while being frank about costs.
> Maybe I
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 8:01 PM Axel Wagner
wrote:
> FTR, I think even a library function that is defined as "the equivalent of
> `append(a[:i], a[j:]...)`" (for example) would provide value.
Yes, but IMO a net negative value. Many people will then mindlessly
just use this O(n) variant even
FTR, I think even a library function that is defined as "the equivalent of
`append(a[:i], a[j:]...)`" (for example) would provide value.
That being said, I also think having this discussion now seems pointless.
Any of it will clearly not happen before generics land (or are rejected),
which is
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 5:36 PM Sean wrote:
> I think there is definitely a need for a built-in "remove" function for
> arrays and slice.
> Everyone is writing their own implementation for this, it is both confusing
> and "x = append(a[:x], b[x:])" like blablabla is not readable.
Please define
I think there is definitely a need for a built-in "*remove*" function for
arrays and slice.
Everyone is writing their own implementation for this, it is both confusing
and "x = append(a[:x], b[x:])" like blablabla is not readable.
5 Şubat 2021 Cuma tarihinde saat 02:55:36 UTC+3 itibarıyla
>> >
>> > A "remove element from _slice_" operation always must make a new
>array
>> > and copy all elements that you intend to stay. Current idiom using
>append
>> > will do this for you while being frank about costs.
>>
>> Maybe I misunderstand what you wrote, but as long as the slice has
>>
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce SFTPGo 2.0.0!
SFTPGo is a fully featured and highly configurable SFTP server with
optional FTP/S and WebDAV support, written in Go. It can serve local
filesystem, S3 (compatible) Object Storage, Google Cloud Storage, Azure
Blob Storage, other SFTP servers.
On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 11:25, Martin Schnabel wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06.02.21 03:32, Wojciech S. Czarnecki wrote:
> > Dnia 2021-02-04, o godz. 00:30:57
> > Selahaddin Harmankaya napisał(a):
> >
> >> There are obviously more things to consider
> >
> > Slice is not an array, it is a _view_into_ an
On 06.02.21 03:32, Wojciech S. Czarnecki wrote:
Dnia 2021-02-04, o godz. 00:30:57
Selahaddin Harmankaya napisał(a):
There are obviously more things to consider
Slice is not an array, it is a _view_into_ an array. Many such views
into the same array may exist simultaneously.
A "remove
