Yep! Can confirm that setting GOTOOLCHAIN=local and changing the go
directive in go.mod to 1.21 (without minor version) fixed the problem.
Thanks again Axel!
:) Hein
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 10:54:15 PM UTC-7 Axel Wagner wrote:
> (or change the `go` directive to `Go 1.21` (no minor versio
Defer evaluates the arguments to the deferred func at the point of the
defer statement.
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 10:58:06 AM UTC-4 Aln Kapa wrote:
> Hi All !
> Need some help, what am I doing wrong?
>
> https://go.dev/play/p/bBlA-i1CxNO
>
> // You can edit this code!
> // Click here and
Thanks for your reply, Ian.
I've decided on using a []*Foo now. Just to clarify, however: In general,
copying/assigning from a struct literal as in
a[i] = Foo{}, is that always safe for these sync types? Or generally, is
copying their "untouched" zero-values always safe?
Antonio
On Sunday, Augu
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 7:54 AM Antonio Caceres Cabrera
wrote:
>
> Go vet complains about this minimal example code
>
> type Foo struct {
> val atomic.Uint64
> }
>
> func main() {
> var foos = make([]Foo, 0)
> var bar Foo
> bar.val.Store(5)
> foos = append(foos, bar
Go vet complains about this minimal example code
type Foo struct {
val atomic.Uint64
}
func main() {
var foos = make([]Foo, 0)
var bar Foo
bar.val.Store(5)
foos = append(foos, bar) // call of append copies lock value:
example.com/foo.Foo contains sync/atomic.U
On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 07:56:30AM -0700, Aln Kapa wrote:
> Need some help, what am I doing wrong?
You don't understand how defer works would be my guess
> func main() {
> Handle(true)// error
> Handle(false) // no error
> HandleWTF(true) // no error ?
Why do you expect this to pri
