Maybe confusingly, that's the expected output:
https://github.com/rsc/quote/blob/master/quote_test.go :)
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:49 PM Alexey Melezhik wrote:
> Thanks. I receive " Don't communicate by sharing memory, share memory by
> communicating. " error (?) when run the example
>
>
Picking the first decimal library on pkg.go.dev, what about
https://play.golang.org/p/Co96HKlvSMp ?
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 7:34 PM Kurtis Rader wrote:
> You've fallen into a common trap. Base 2 floating point values cannot
> represent most decimal values precisely. This is why you should
https://play.golang.org/p/LNP6SK1J02V
var b64 [64]byte // 64 zero bytes
var x = make([]byte, 64)
fmt.Println(bytes.Equal(b64[:], x))
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 7:32 PM Gert wrote:
> Is it possible to write this without creating a separate var b64 first?
> Basically just write it in one line?
>
>
This proposal is not very much different from a one-liner
if err != nil { }
It's just 10 more characters. Granted, gofmt won't leave the one-liner
formatted that way, but it's not much more typing and comes with the
benefit of not needing a new keyword.
One variation on this proposal that is a
Even though you can get at the values by iterating, I can't seem to do so
with a direct reference to the NaN key:
https://play.golang.org/p/69m-LK7obHA
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 4:18 PM Burak Serdar wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 4:59 PM Dan Kortschak
> wrote:
> >
> > They are not
