> I think the amount of hair-splitting over what is an object oriented
language is reason to say it *isn't* an Object Oriented language at all.
Given the FAQ header's "Is Go an object-oriented language? emphasizing that
"object-oriented" is in lowercase, not the titlecase "Object-Oriented" that
> If the answer to that question is "yes and no," it'd be less ambiguous to
simply say, "no." And that would be a definitive way of indicating that it
woul be inappropriate to apply many patterns from object oriented languages
to Go -- and to encourage people to accept Go for what it is.
Go doe
Hi Keith,
> The stdlib is organized to take advantage of hardware instructions when
they are available and falls back to portable Go code when they aren't.
You actually answered my question == the ASM is the latest optimization
direction. So the desgin sequences are always:
1. Pure software so
Hi all,
To clarify, which one is latest and right optimization development
direction?
Example case:
(floor_asm.go <--> floor_amd64.s VS floor_noasm.go)
1)
https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/refs/tags/go1.19.2:src/math/floor_asm.go;bpv=0;bpt=0
2)
https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/ref
Hi all,
Just to confirm, is the unicode special case "AzeriCase" == "TurkishCase"?
Location:
https://cs.opensource.google/go/go/+/go1.19.1:src/unicode/letter.go;l=64
I don't know about Turkish so help is needed just in case their charsets
are different. Stumbled upon this while developing my
22 at 09:54:13 UTC+1 kortschak wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 01:47 -0700, Holloway Kean Ho wrote:
>> > What exactly you're trying to achieve by taking a very elaborated,
>> > crystal-clear, good-willed security-related article way out of its
>> > c
Hi,
I be very blunt here:
1. What exactly you're trying to achieve by taking a very elaborated,
crystal-clear, good-willed security-related article way out of its context
with your thread title here and agitate some of the Go maintainers here?
Why I'm asking:
- AFAIK, behavior
They are build-constraints for cross platform support.
Doc: https://pkg.go.dev/cmd/go#hdr-Build_constraints
I believe to-date is only using go:build. +build was for Go 1.16 and before
so only use that if you plans to support legacy compiler.
On Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 10:37:16 AM UTC+8 cuiw.
>I want to encrypt my algorithm library, is there any good way in Go. My
library is used in both Windows and Linux
I'm assuming you're doing it for scalable distribution since Zhaoxun
already answered local development environment. In this case it makes no
sense as I can still use disassembler
HI all,
> Does anyone know what the upper bound on this could be?
Interesting question. I have a thought experiment theory: "LIMIT_MAX =
(TOTAL_MEMORY - OTHER_SERVICES - DATA) / MBIT"
Explanation:
1. Assuming you're using 64-bit OS and memory structure is aligned using
64-bit memory, your MBI
10 matches
Mail list logo
