other requests in flight (on different connections I assume) -
> let those continue - just put any new requests on a new transport for that
> host (after a 500 error is encountered) - then tear down the bad when it
> has no more requests being processed.
>
> On Apr 3, 2024, at 1:50
direct violation of
> GotConnInfo’s doc). I would expect this to error out anything inflight, but
> otherwise be benign (though I have not checked :) ).
>
> -eli
>
> On Apr 2, 2024, at 3:29 PM, Jim Minter wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had any i
you already know the server is problematic, you could just set Close
> on the original request.
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 15:29 Jim Minter wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone had any ideas about
>> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/21978 ("
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone had any ideas
about https://github.com/golang/go/issues/21978 ("net/http: no Client API
to close server connection based on Response") -- it's an old issue, but
it's something that's biting me currently and I can't see a neat way to
solve it.
As an HTTP
On Thursday, 8 June 2023 at 22:23:51 UTC-6 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 8:59 PM Jim Minter wrote:
>
> I'm rather confused by instantiation of structs in generic functions. I
happen to be using go protobufs. Unlike with `json.Unmarshal`,
`proto.Unmarshal` expects to r
Hi,
I'm rather confused by instantiation of structs in generic functions. I
happen to be using go protobufs. Unlike with `json.Unmarshal`,
`proto.Unmarshal` expects to receive a fully pre-instantiated struct to
unmarshal into. The non-generic case looks like this:
var _ proto.Message =
Hi,
I don't fully understand why we have to use replace directives (I'm
still learning my way around go modules), but I have tried extensively
to remove them and I can't get go mod to honour an acceptable set of
versions in the requirement.
I am guessing at a few potential reasons why this
Sadly not. Doing this doesn't cause an error, but it also doesn't change
the relevant replace directive in the go.mod file.
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
...etc...
go get -u ./...
I'm wondering: is there a better way? Should there be?
Many thanks!
Jim Minter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
guarantee a working binary at the end, but it
provides an upper bound figure that suggests to me that there are
potentially substantial and worthwhile savings to be had against larger
binary sizes by improving the pruning code if possible.
Regards,
Jim Minter
[1]
https://github.com/
10 matches
Mail list logo
