I found this webpage from MS which talks about configuring Windows Defender.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/turn-off-defender-antivirus-protection-in-windows-security-99e6004f-c54c-8509-773c-a4d776b77960
I'm running a Windows 10 VM via VirtualBox on a MacBookPro. I have my $HOME
(wh
>
> we should have a tool that, given a contract body, produces a minimal
> contract body that expresses the same contract.
And run it on save, like gofmt. Or just make it part of gofmt.
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 4:22:34 PM UTC-4, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:2
it easier").
— L
On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 at 9:53:33 AM UTC-4, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:25 PM Larry Clapp > wrote:
>
>> This question frankly struck me odd, given the context. To paraphrase:
>> "Do I have exampl
t; Do you have actual examples of how that would be useful to you?
>
> On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 9:45:12 PM UTC-4, Larry Clapp wrote:
>>
>> The conversation here is deep, and I haven't followed all of it. I
>> *think* y'all are discussing some different contr
The conversation here is deep, and I haven't followed all of it. I *think*
y'all
are discussing some different contract system than the actual draft
proposal?
If that's the case:
You can't express field-accessors, which is an actual, inarguable reduction
> in power that I'm perfectly fine wi
ion to an interface type." It'd be nice if you could define
said interface type in the same file, and not inline with the contract.
— L
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 at 4:42:34 PM UTC-4, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 1:16 PM, Larry Clapp > wr
The draft proposal says
"The body of a contract may not refer to any name defined in the current
package"
but then later has this example
package move
contract counter(x T) {
var _ int = x.Count
}
contract counters(T1, T2) { // as with a func, parameter names may be
omitted.
// Use contrac
he "way" is "using as key in a map" or "using as
> comparable value"?
>
> If I'm passing an argument to a function F, is the implied contract
> that "you can call F with that argument" or "you can call any function
> with the same
checking succeeds, the type arguments are valid.
Thanks anyway.
On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 10:17:41 AM UTC-4, Larry Clapp wrote:
>
> contract { var _ map[T]bool }
>
>
> Would this contract allow T to be used in a map to some other type than
> bool? e.g. map[T]int? If so, w
>
> contract { var _ map[T]bool }
Would this contract allow T to be used in a map to some other type than
bool? e.g. map[T]int? If so, why? Why is bool a stand-in for "any
type"? (I apologize if this has been dealt with elsewhere; this is a big
topic.)
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 7
Need more shift keys!
I'm pretty sure if I used them every day, I'd learn pretty quickly that « &
» are from opt-\ and shift-opt-\, and ‹ & › are from shift-opt-3 & 4.
Windows users ... are on their own. Find a use for the
otherwise-poorly-used numeric keypad, maybe. (Sometimes I wish Macs co
11 matches
Mail list logo
