Hello,
I'm trying to write an application that will basically serve as a tunnel
between some servers outside our network and our internal servers. For this
I've started using a snippet that creates a tcp listener and then dials to
a remote host. Code is shown here:
gt; wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 2:50 PM Anthony Martin > wrote:
> > >
> > > What version of Go are you using?
> > >
> > > XXX ZZZ > once said:
> > > > fmt.(*pp).fmtString(0xc023c17740, 0x0, 0x5, 0xc00076)
> > > >
using go version go1.12.4 linux/amd64
El jueves, 2 de mayo de 2019, 18:50:24 (UTC-3), Anthony Martin escribió:
>
> What version of Go are you using?
>
> XXX ZZZ > once said:
> > fmt.(*pp).fmtString(0xc023c17740, 0x0, 0x5, 0xc00076)
> > /usr/local/go/src/fmt/p
; -- Marcin
>
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:13 AM Burak Serdar > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:31 AM XXX ZZZ > > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > We are having a random panic on our go application that is happening
>> o
I did but nothing detected.
However there aren't any goroutined involved (except for the http request),
other than that, this variable isn't shared among routines.
El jueves, 2 de mayo de 2019, 14:54:42 (UTC-3), Ian Lance Taylor escribió:
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 10:31 AM XXX ZZZ >
Hello,
We are having a random panic on our go application that is happening once
every million requests or so, and so far we haven't been able to reproduce
it nor to even grasp what's going on.
Basically our code goes like:
type Subid_info struct{
Affiliate_subid string
being said, to reiterate, the quoting of args i.e. constructing a
> single string out of multiple args and then parsing it back into parts is
> not formally specified and even if it was, different implementations can
> have bugs. It could just as well be issue on the chrome side.
>
\Local\\Google\\Chrome\\Application\\chrome.exe"
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, March 21, 2019 at 12:13:52 PM UTC-4, XXX ZZZ wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to launch Chrome from Go under windows, some of the arguments
>> I'm passing have cus
Hello,
I'm trying to launch Chrome from Go under windows, some of the arguments
I'm passing have custom paths in it and it seems that go is sanitizing
these arguments and not recognizing the paths. Basically it seems to be
appending the application path into the arguments with a path.
Code is
Thanks guys, Patricia Tree did the trick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
Hello,
I'm trying to check an IP against a list of several CIDR ranges, so far the
most obvious way to do it seems to parse both the IP and the cidr ranges (
ParseCIDR) and then do a net.contain() however, if we have more than 1 CIDR
we have to loop checking one by one which imho is incredible
rg/p/MwpdBwvRnUP
>
> On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 2:47:49 PM UTC-6, XXX ZZZ wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to parse an XML with golang but I'm having a hard time
>> creating a parser for the string, in fact I couldn't even get an output
>> using
Hello,
I'm trying to parse an XML with golang but I'm having a hard time creating
a parser for the string, in fact I couldn't even get an output using
interface{}.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"encoding/xml"
)
type MMXML_Listing struct {
Original_title string `xml:"title"`
Hello,
So I'm starting to play with sync pool on a program that needs to allocate
a ton of short lived objects per server request. Performance seems to be
better when using sync pool however I've noticed that upon releasing the
object and then retrieving it again, will produce a "new object"
Hello,
So we are making a platform where we have to use a TON of short lived
structs, in order to optimize this we intend to use sync pool, however on
our benchmark tests I have found that it only seems to improve performance
when the struct is big enough, for smaller structs ie: (4-5 string
15 matches
Mail list logo
