Hi,
I am having issues with some concurrency and race conditions.
I believe this is not doing what I think it does. IE I am thinking this
would allow locking of any variable in the struct however it does not seem
to be applying to buffer of type bytes.Buffer. What am I missing here?
I have:
OK, I know I am doing something dumb and have a case of the Monday's. If
anyone is able to point out my stupid it would be much appreciated.
Output when opening the file in S3:
Makes sense. Best I am going to get is a linear search w/ a divide and
conquer if I want to speed it up. Thanks needed the sounding board and feed
back.
Thanks,
Anthony
On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 8:16:44 PM UTC-7, Daniela Petruzalek wrote:
>
> Do you have an example?
>
> I'm assuming tha
I have approximately 9 characters that all need to be replaced with
different characters. I know there are a number of ways to do this but what
is the most efficient?
- 1) Do a []byte walk and compare each byte and replace when found?
- Seems expensive if you have a 100 bytes in the []byt
Jakob,
Thank you. I knew I had to be missing some nuance of how to use the library
correctly.
Thanks,
Anthony
On Wednesday, April 18, 2018 at 1:44:13 AM UTC-7, Jakob Borg wrote:
>
> That is a much too large value to be precisely represented by a float64.
> You need more bits, and you need to t
I have been playing with the karatsuba algorithm and was doing some testing
testing to compute the correct values of two large numbers
3141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592
and 2718281828459045235360287471352662497757247093699959574966967627. When
working with the mat
Makes sense. I think my question was more asking about the details of how
the pool (sql.DB) worked. So this clears it up. The driver would provide
the pool this connector to use vs the DNS string and that Connector could
re-auth etc... This definitely allows for what I am looking for to be
solv
What would happen if idle/closed connections that are in the SQL
interface's connection pool? They go back to the driver provided Connector
interface to re-authenticate/create a connection?
Thanks,
Anthony
On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 10:49:00 AM UTC-8, Daniel Theophanes wrote:
>
> It allow
So this would allow for the driver to support a different method of opening
the connection that the sql interface would use when it needed to open a
new connection correct?
Anthony
On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 9:44:05 AM UTC-8, Daniel Theophanes wrote:
>
> Go1.10 will ship with a driver conn
This does not help because if there is no connection in the connection pool
the interface will open a new connection with previously supplied DSN from
the sql.Open call.
Anthony
On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 7:22:00 AM UTC-8, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:06:27AM
It appears the Generic Interface for SQL (database/sql) does not support
the ability to use short lived DSN's for cases like AWS's IAM
Authentication to RDS instances. It appears that when doing its connection
pooling activities it always uses whatever DSN was passed initially on Open.
1) Is th
11 matches
Mail list logo