I don't know how you can live without Generics but you can't live without Lambda expression. No Go Authors will not listen to anyone. If I could(because of the project I am working on) I would never use a language like Go and would never look back. There are much better choices out there.
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:10:35 PM UTC-5, Felix wrote: > > Go as a language made a choice to leave certain things out, because > there is other ways to solve them, I live without generics and am happy, > no while loop no problem and etc. > > But am hoping that the entire Go community + Go team + who ever it may > concern > that we all accept that we need a lambda syntax, > > ----------- > > (input parameters) => expression > > ----------- > > (x, y) => x == y > > ----------- > > () => SomeMethod() > > ----------- > > this will really help with things like > implementing linq like in go check > https://github.com/ahmetalpbalkan/go-linq > ( > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topicsearchin/golang-nuts/lambda%7Csort:date%7Cspell:true/golang-nuts/L-kxltsynh0 > > ) > > Am looking at the lambda expression from C# > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397687.aspx > this will make functional things nice in Go > > implementing a map over a slice like > > arr := []int{2, 3, 4} > map(x => x * 2, arr) > > simpler that > map(func(x int){ x * 2}, arr) > > So please Command Pike don't tell me no :-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
