, that is not
the most germane point of view.
(Yes, I know what Marvin mentioned.)
Thanks,
Mike
On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 at 1:18:00 PM UTC-5 Marvin Renich wrote:
> * mspre...@gmail.com [240207 10:43]:
> > The go language is getting better and better for functional programming,
> > and I am
The go language is getting better and better for functional programming,
and I am here for it. I have enjoyed using APL, Scheme, Python. I was
excited to see https://go.dev/wiki/RangefuncExperiment . However, I am
puzzled by the choice to name the function parameter that _receives_ a
Seq's
With contextual logging, do we now have a better pattern easily available?
Associate with the context a Logger that goes to T.Log?
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 5:00:51 AM UTC-4 Patrick Ohly wrote:
> The underlying problem is that a "go test" only has one output stream: the
> text written via
