Oops, spoke too soon. Got you now Ian. Thanks.
On Mar 2, 2018 1:37 AM, "Agniva De Sarker"
wrote:
> We can still support all processors. I believe it should be possible to
> check for cpuid flags and conditionally emit these instructions.
>
> On Mar 2, 2018 12:23 AM, "Ian Lance Taylor" wrote:
>
We can still support all processors. I believe it should be possible to
check for cpuid flags and conditionally emit these instructions.
On Mar 2, 2018 12:23 AM, "Ian Lance Taylor" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Agniva De Sarker
> wrote:
> >
> > I believe using the non-destructive 3 o
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Agniva De Sarker
wrote:
>
> I believe using the non-destructive 3 operand form will help a lot in
> reducing the size of binaries. And also, it might give us a good base to add
> FMA support and SIMD optimizations later.
>
> I have been adding fast paths to some mat
Hi,
I believe using the non-destructive 3 operand form will help a lot in
reducing the size of binaries. And also, it might give us a good base to
add FMA support and SIMD optimizations later.
I have been adding fast paths to some math functions to use AVX
instructions, but I was just wonderin
