A readme to make it discoverable would be nice as well.
On Saturday, 14 December 2019 04:17:24 UTC+11, Ivan Trubach wrote:
>
> Sure, I will. The dyld package should work for dlsym C calls, however I
> don’t think it’s possible to do callbacks with the functionality runtime
> exposes (i.e. I am t
Sure, I will. The dyld package should work for dlsym C calls, however I don’t
think it’s possible to do callbacks with the functionality runtime exposes
(i.e. I am talking about API that sys/windows package provides).
So, yeah, while there is no need for Darwin dlopen in x/sys/unix, we still nee
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:55 PM 'Ivan Trubach' via golang-nuts
wrote:
>
> Hi, I’ve stubbled upon issue 18296 (dlopen/dlsym without CGo). The discussion
> focuses on Linux, but since Go on Darwin already co-exists with libSystem,
> wouldn’t it be trivial to add Darwin dlopen support to e.g. x/sy
Hi, I’ve stubbled upon issue 18296 (dlopen/dlsym without CGo). The discussion
focuses on Linux, but since Go on Darwin already co-exists with libSystem,
wouldn’t it be trivial to add Darwin dlopen support to e.g. x/sys/unix?
I’ve also set up a small standalone dlopen demo: https://github.com/tie
