In that proposal, some more syntax and semantics are being added - IMHO.
One problem here is the name of the error variable. Here we explicitly have
to used named return values - no new syntax there.
And return() and panic() on left side, only accept error type.
They will only be triggered when
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:46 AM Kaveh Shahbazian
wrote:
>
> Go can already pass/pipe the result of a function, which returns multiple
> values, to another function, which accepts the same values as arguments. A
> similar mechanism can be used for handling errors, by passing/pipe them to a
> spe
Go can already pass/pipe the result of a function, which returns multiple
values, to another function, which accepts the same values as arguments. A
similar mechanism can be used for handling errors, by passing/pipe them to
a special construct.
Now, assume we have a function named funcCtx:
fun
