The only real downsides, I think, are that compiler errors gets harder to
read:
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/21866
And likewise, that the name won't appear at runtime, so if you print things
using `reflect`, the result will be less readable.
I think there are cases where it has advantages,
TLDR: Why should I NOT the alias form `type ... = interface {...}` instead
of the standard `type ... interface {...}` for interface declarations?
The extended question:
The normal type definition for an interface in go would be `type TypeName
interface {...}`. This results in a new type, which
