Re: [go-nuts] Is x/exp/shiny dead?

This sounds great. So it is not entirely dead. On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 8:24:43 AM UTC+5, Daniel Skinner wrote: > > As one of the persons reached out to for that effort (and I'm not a shiny > contributor), my current unpublished work will eventually serve as a basis > for some proposals to

Re: [go-nuts] Is x/exp/shiny dead?

Thanks for the great work on exp/shiny. Where does shiny need most attention/contributions? I think a status report of some sort would help others pickup where it's left off now. On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 7:44:42 AM UTC+5, Nigel Tao wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:25 AM, fazal

Re: [go-nuts] Is x/exp/shiny dead?

As one of the persons reached out to for that effort (and I'm not a shiny contributor), my current unpublished work will eventually serve as a basis for some proposals to shiny for review that maybe after some testing and input from others will stand on its on merits, for such a proposal. Even as

Re: [go-nuts] Is x/exp/shiny dead?

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:25 AM, fazal wrote: > It was one of the things I was looking forward to, but I see almost no > activity there, which makes me sad. It's certainly not very active right now. I work part time, for uninteresting reasons, and shiny is unfortunately

Re: [go-nuts] Is x/exp/shiny dead?

[ +nigeltao ] On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:25 PM, fazal wrote: > It was one of the things I was looking forward to, but I see almost no > activity there, which makes me sad. > > Is it because it is mature enough for general use? There is a road-map for > widgets but non are

[go-nuts] Is x/exp/shiny dead?

It was one of the things I was looking forward to, but I see almost no activity there, which makes me sad. Is it because it is mature enough for general use? There is a road-map for widgets but non are complete. I really hope it is not abandoned because Go really needs a GUI library that is