Re: [go-nuts] Presidence of Operators

2018-12-14 Thread fgergo
(please reply to the list, so others with a similar question can find this thread.) I'm sorry, I should have made it clear: for me it's hard to parse the question. I'll try again: could you please write 1 working example in play.golang.org with the assumed precedence rules? If you could share a li

Re: [go-nuts] Presidence of Operators

2018-12-14 Thread fgergo
Could you please give 2 examples, where the results depend on the precedence? Maybe on play.golang.org ? Maybe this also helps: https://golang.org/ref/spec#Operators On 12/14/18, 伊藤和也 wrote: > Can I say the precedence of paretheses are lower than unary operators and > higher than binary operators

Re: [go-nuts] Presidence of Operators

2018-12-14 Thread Jan Mercl
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:45 AM 伊藤和也 wrote: > Can I say the precedence of paretheses are lower than unary operators and higher than binary operators. As parenthesis are not operators they have no operator precedence. But see: https://golang.org/ref/spec#Order_of_evaluation Explicit parenth

[go-nuts] Presidence of Operators

2018-12-13 Thread 伊藤和也
Can I say the precedence of paretheses are lower than unary operators and higher than binary operators. unary operators (high) ↑ parentheses ↑ ↑ binary operators (low) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nu