Re: [go-nuts] Re: About 64bits alignment

Thanks for the clarification. On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 8:57:00 PM UTC-4, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:49 PM T L > > wrote: > > > > Is the bug zone outdated now. How about the support on other 32-bit > archs? Such as mips? > > The bug description is not out of

Re: [go-nuts] Re: About 64bits alignment

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:49 PM T L wrote: > > Is the bug zone outdated now. How about the support on other 32-bit archs? > Such as mips? The bug description is not out of date. Yes, 32-bit MIPS also requires 8 byte alignment for the 64-bit operations. I sent https://golang.org/cl/161697 to

[go-nuts] Re: About 64bits alignment

Is the bug zone outdated now. How about the support on other 32-bit archs? Such as mips? On Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 12:03:59 PM UTC-4, T L wrote: > > the sync/atomic docs, https://golang.org/pkg/sync/atomic/, says in the > end of the docs > > > On x86-32, the 64-bit functions use

[go-nuts] Re: About 64bits alignment

Arm means arm as in linux/arm. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

Re: [go-nuts] Re: About 64bits alignment

On 29 March 2017 at 04:44, T L wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 12:03:59 AM UTC+8, T L wrote: >> >> the sync/atomic docs, https://golang.org/pkg/sync/atomic/, says in the >> end of the docs >> >> >> On x86-32, the 64-bit functions use instructions unavailable

[go-nuts] Re: About 64bits alignment

On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 12:03:59 AM UTC+8, T L wrote: > > the sync/atomic docs, https://golang.org/pkg/sync/atomic/, says in the > end of the docs > > > On x86-32, the 64-bit functions use instructions unavailable before the >> Pentium MMX. >> > On non-Linux ARM, the 64-bit functions